Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success

The Danish company has benefitted from being built on a long-term perspective

Many one-product companies run out of road. Small plastic bricks have supported Denmark’s Lego for more than 70 years. A clear focus can pay off. But, amid a debate over the health of public markets, its success also demonstrates the benefits of its distinctive corporate structure.

The toymaker’s sales growth of 2 per cent last year was dragged down by a weak performance in China. But it was respectable enough given a seven per cent decline in toy industry sales. Lego’s sales are not much less than the combined total of its quoted US rivals Mattel and Hasbro. 

Inflation, one cause of the industry’s woes, is subsiding. Low birth rates, another problem, will persist. That is partly offset by adult fans of Lego. This group — known as Afols — creates a market for costly, complicated kits like the Titanic or Eiffel Tower. This “Icons” line made some of the biggest gains of any toy property globally in 2023, according to Circana. 

New products accounted for roughly half of Lego’s portfolio last year. Innovation isn’t without risk: novelty can damage profitability if it means fewer universal pieces that can be produced in high volumes for lots of different kits. The proliferation of parts contributed to Lego’s downturn in 2003, says academic David Robertson. However, the business has since expanded so it can use more parts without hurting the ratio of sales to profits.   

Lego’s operating profit margin fell by 1.7 per cent to 26 per cent, as it spent more on stores, its supply chain and digital operations. Even so, that is nearly three times Hasbro’s adjusted operating figure. Were it quoted, Lego would be worth much more than the $43bn estimate arrived at by using Hasbro’s trailing EV-to-ebitda ratio of 15.5 times.

But Lego is privately held and there is no sign of that changing. Kirkbi, an investment vehicle run by the founding family, owns 75 per cent, with the remainder owned by the Lego Foundation. When an heir opted to sell some Kirkbi shares for $930mn last year, family members took up the slack. Outside investors’ only exposure to the brand is through Legoland-owner Merlin Entertainments. Blackstone and Canadian pension fund CPPIB teamed up with Kirkbi on the £6bn take-private bid in 2019. 

External investors might have been less inclined to tolerate last year’s 10 per cent dividend cut to fund investment. There is evidence that tightly held companies like Lego benefit from a long-term perspective. Building the business, like its product, is an exercise in patience. It can yield impressive results.

vanessa.houlder@ft.com

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

默茨处理俄罗斯冻结资产的方案为什么失败了?

法国与比利时、意大利及一些小国站在一起,支持以欧盟预算作担保,从资本市场借入900亿欧元以援助基辅。

特朗普媒体收购核聚变公司:金融与核聚变的共通之处

Lex专栏:现金随处可得,但股市的热情却是稀缺的礼物。煤炭与现金壳已过时,如今当红的是聚变和炒作。
11小时前

普京就欧盟冻结资产发出报复威胁 欧盟各国感到不安

意大利、比利时和奥地利担心俄罗斯针对其企业采取行动。

派拉蒙与Netflix为争夺华纳兄弟探索的角力

华纳兄弟探索拒绝了派拉蒙的收购要约,为这场可能重塑好莱坞的收购拉锯战再添变数。

Lex专栏:马斯克收购推特的剧本无助于华纳兄弟收购案

华纳兄弟探索希望拉里•埃里森提供万无一失的个人担保,就像马斯克在收购推特时所做的那样。

万斯力挺特朗普经济政策,试图扭转舆论风向

美国副总统呼吁民众在生活成本负担能力问题上保持耐心,他还把美国顽固的通胀归咎于前总统拜登。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×