AI start-up Anthropic settles landmark copyright suit for $1.5bn - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

AI start-up Anthropic settles landmark copyright suit for $1.5bn

Case will compensate authors but could raise costs of training large language models

AI start-up Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5bn to settle a copyright lawsuit over its use of pirated texts, setting a precedent for tech companies facing intellectual property cases from authors and publishers.

The settlement, which must be approved by the San Francisco federal judge overseeing the case, would be “the largest publicly reported copyright recovery in history”, according to a court filing on Friday.

The class action suit was brought by authors who claimed Anthropic had downloaded 465,000 books and other texts from “pirated websites” including Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror, which it then used to train its large language models.

Failure to reach an agreement would have led to a trial, with the prospect of damages of up to $1tn. That would have bankrupted Anthropic, a four-year-old start-up backed by Amazon and Google that was recently valued at $170bn.

The case is among several facing artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI and Meta, alleging they have improperly used copyrighted works to train their models.

The results will help determine how authors are compensated for the use of their works and could have significant ramifications for how AI companies train their models and the costs of developing them.

Mary Rasenberger, chief executive of the Authors Guild, said Friday’s settlement sent a “strong message to the AI industry that there are serious consequences when they pirate authors’ works to train their AI, robbing those least able to afford it”.

Anthropic and other AI companies have claimed that training models on copyrighted books is fair use, arguing that their models transform the original work into something with a new meaning.

In June, the California district court ruled that Anthropic’s use of some copyrighted works in such a way was fair. But it determined that storing pirated works was “inherently, irredeemably infringing”, teeing up Friday’s settlement.

Friday’s ruling also means Anthropic will have to destroy the datasets it had downloaded from Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror.

“In June, the district court issued a landmark ruling on AI development and copyright law, finding that Anthropic’s approach to training AI models constitutes fair use. Today’s settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims,” said Anthropic’s deputy general counsel Aparna Sridhar in a statement.

“We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organisations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery and solve complex problems,” she added.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

FT社评:伯纳姆的新口号在政治上高明,在经济上成疑

英国政府若支持产业集群并扩大机会获取渠道,将更为有利。
49分钟前

Lex专栏:数据中心能逃脱“超级工程”魔咒吗?

从材料短缺、规划延误、劳动力匮乏到电力供应,各个环节都可能出岔子。

全球2万亿美元的利息账单

目前,包括美、法、英在内的许多国家的偿债支出已超过国防开支。

韩国人工智能催生楼市狂热,总统李在明面临施政压力

首尔楼市的脱缰式暴涨导致年轻人群体愤怒加剧,对李在明政府而言,这正演变成棘手的政治风险。

Lex专栏:高昂的油价正在反噬自身

原油价格高企有助于提升清洁能源技术的竞争力。

共和党人担心特朗普已成为竞选活动的负资产

特朗普的低支持率和煽动性言论已促使共和党内的一些中期选举候选人与他保持距离。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×