Let technology explore what the voters really want - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Let technology explore what the voters really want

New insights into motivation and strength of feeling could help democracy work better
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":7.24,"text":"The writer is author of the forthcoming book ‘The Majority Myth — How Voting Really Works’"}],[{"start":13.43,"text":"It is one of the oddities of public life in western democracies that, despite decades of digital transformation, the way we vote remains fundamentally untouched. Technology has been added but unimaginatively: electronic voting machines and online ballots simply facilitate the same system. The ballot box is treated as if it were a sacred relic, yet our voting customs are not so old. "}],[{"start":42.97,"text":"The secret ballot was introduced in the UK in 1872 to prevent landlords from intimidating tenants — as with other voting rules, it was a practical fix, not a constitutional ideal. The problems have changed and technology now affords opportunities for voting that the architects of our election systems could never have imagined. "}],[{"start":67.32,"text":"One of the weaknesses of modern elections is the lack of information transmitted by the outcomes. Voting produces a result but does not guide the winner. Contrary to the phrase “the people have spoken”, the electorate emits more of a monosyllable — approval or rejection. For a contrast, think of the US Supreme Court, where the votes include an opinion and a summary of the justices’ thinking, enabling those who apply the decision to understand what was intended. "}],[{"start":96.97,"text":"With AI now able to aggregate patterns of reasoning, an anonymised national rationale for the support for parties and how it affected an electoral outcome could be created — it would be a resource to refer to when politicians claim to know what voters elected them to do. "}],[{"start":116.61,"text":"One promising system is range voting, which lets citizens express not just a preference but its strength. A generation ago this would have been impossible; today, it could run on any standard digital interface. Edward Saperia, dean of the London College of Political Technology, points out that such systems rarely change who wins but they can improve the tone of politics. Theatrical populism would be held in check by a genuine map of public feeling that shows which proposals enjoy support and why."}],[{"start":151.46,"text":"Other methods go further. So-called deep voting invites electors to digitally rate why they support or dislike policy choices and how intensely. Technically simple yet politically powerful, it would allow governments to see the contours of their mandate: “We elect you for your housing policy, spare us your culture wars,” for example. The people would be heard, and they could add footnotes. "}],[{"start":178.94,"text":"Even the sensitive question of voter qualification could be approached constructively. We rightly fear any restriction of the right to vote based on wealth or education. But technologically enabled weighting — for example, giving more emphasis to parents on questions to do with children — might be helpful, though it would need strict safeguards to remain fair and transparent."}],[{"start":203.47,"text":"Technology could also expand who has access to power. Citizen juries (voluntary panels, drawn at random from the voting population or from people with relevant knowledge or experience) are now feasible at large scale — containing perhaps as many as 300,000 people."}],[{"start":224,"text":"The idea that a simple majority can capture what the nation wants was exposed as fantasy with the binary choice of the UK’s 2016 Brexit referendum. If democratic procedures are part of national infrastructure, they deserve the same scrutiny and reform as railways, schools and the rest of our public services."}],[{"start":247.48,"text":"What is missing is the courage to admit that democracy has already been captured by tech. Digital networks shape what voters see, believe and discuss. Our typical response — to scold citizens into “resilience” against misinformation — displays wishful thinking. Don’t lecture the voters or denounce the tech, use it for a practical modernisation to improve democracy."}],[{"start":282.17,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1775458791_8168.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

震动土耳其的200亿美元欺诈丑闻

投资者损失数十亿美元。批评人士谴责埃尔多安政府任人唯亲。

为何美国难以为AI热潮提供电力

美国电力线路建设速度仅为十年前的四分之一。

法国控制非洲货币的殖民之战

法国创设的非洲金融共同体法郎已在西非和中非多个地区沿用近80年,许多国家独立数十年后仍在使用。这种货币究竟是维持经济稳定的工具,还是法国延续对前殖民地影响力的殖民遗产?

本周图表:数据中心遭批评

资本开支,迎接选民。

为何富裕的爱尔兰仍让人感到贫穷

都柏林对企业税收入的依赖岌岌可危,其中一半来自苹果、礼来和微软。

中国叫停软银交易,机器人竞赛由此拉开序幕

北京的干预主义反映出全球在人工智能领域的竞争日益加剧。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×