Listen up: AI’s communication blind spot - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Listen up: AI’s communication blind spot

How we hear other humans is more crucial than ever
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":7.55,"text":"The writer is a sociolinguist and the author of ‘Kiku: The Japanese Art of Good Listening’"}],[{"start":15.280000000000001,"text":"AI is often framed as a challenge to human intelligence. It builds on what we understand about how language is produced and recognised, performing these tasks with increasing speed and precision. What remains far less understood, however, is how our thinking is shaped by the way we listen."}],[{"start":36.13,"text":"While AI is seen to outperform humans in speed, pattern recognition and consistency, the strength of human intellect is often located in the more diffuse and harder-to-measure complexity of communication. "}],[{"start":53.97,"text":"AI systems process information by identifying patterns and generating outputs based on data that has already been encoded with meaning. They operate on what is legible, stable and defined. A human listener, by contrast, does more than interpret and respond to what they understand. They also take in what is not yet known, exploring it before it settles into something recognisable. They listen for meaning that has not yet fully formed, drawing on culture and experience to attend to tone, hesitation, ambiguity and what remains unsaid. Rather than eliminate variability and ambiguity, human listening works within it. "}],[{"start":99.37,"text":"This capacity to sit with uncertainty in listening remains largely unexplored, in part because it is difficult to measure, especially in comparison to speaking. "}],[{"start":113.16,"text":"What can be measured becomes visible and optimised, which is why contemporary work environments tend to favour clarity, speed and resolution. Employees are trained to filter and extract what is relevant, actionable and clear. These habits shape what can be heard. When listening becomes a process of selecting from preconceived meanings, some of what does not immediately fit is excluded. The result can be miscommunication and a narrowing of the space in which understanding might emerge."}],[{"start":147.8,"text":"The growing discomfort with the language of “active listening” reflects some of this tension. The term now often refers to observable behaviours such as nodding, paraphrasing and maintaining eye contact. These behaviours have value, but they shift attention towards how listening appears. It becomes possible to perform attentiveness without actually discovering anything new."}],[{"start":177.34,"text":"Other languages make this more explicit. In Japanese, the verb “to listen” can be written in different ways. One form, 聞く, refers to hearing or asking as a functional intake of information. Another, 聴く, points to a mode of engagement that involves staying with what is not yet fully articulated. The distinction is subtle, but it highlights something that English tends to compress. Listening is not a single act but a shifting orientation. Rather than simply supporting thinking or mirroring speaking, it shapes the conditions under which both can occur."}],[{"start":217.28,"text":"AI is making this distinction more visible. It demonstrates how far information processing can be extended, while also revealing what is lost when communication is treated primarily as clearly coded input and output. "}],[{"start":234.68,"text":"Systems can generate fluent responses without encountering uncertainty. But human communication takes place in fluid moments that resist rigid codification. Intelligence lies in a willingness to remain with what is still forming, allowing meaning to shift and develop."}],[{"start":256.13,"text":"Rather than compete with AI on speed and precision, we can use the technology to help clarify that the next shift in our understanding of communication does not lie in refining how efficiently we respond but in recognising what allows us to remain in conversation as meaning unfolds. The advantage of human intelligence is its ability to stay open, allowing understanding to emerge rather than forcing a resolution. "}],[{"start":297.73999999999995,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1775890763_2997.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

震动土耳其的200亿美元欺诈丑闻

投资者损失数十亿美元。批评人士谴责埃尔多安政府任人唯亲。

为何美国难以为AI热潮提供电力

美国电力线路建设速度仅为十年前的四分之一。

法国控制非洲货币的殖民之战

法国创设的非洲金融共同体法郎已在西非和中非多个地区沿用近80年,许多国家独立数十年后仍在使用。这种货币究竟是维持经济稳定的工具,还是法国延续对前殖民地影响力的殖民遗产?

本周图表:数据中心遭批评

资本开支,迎接选民。

为何富裕的爱尔兰仍让人感到贫穷

都柏林对企业税收入的依赖岌岌可危,其中一半来自苹果、礼来和微软。

中国叫停软银交易,机器人竞赛由此拉开序幕

北京的干预主义反映出全球在人工智能领域的竞争日益加剧。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×