The annoyance economy isn’t going anywhere - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

The annoyance economy isn’t going anywhere

We must find our own amusements in dealing with spam, robocalls and chatbots
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.6,"text":"Relaxed, with stretches of time between ice creams, a Spanish beach holiday seemed the perfect moment to tackle an issue that had been weighing on me for months: cancelling a tech subscription. So I found myself passed between customer service assistants for over an hour, increasingly frazzled, before giving up. Big tech, 1; me, 0."}],[{"start":27.950000000000003,"text":"This is one example of the “annoyance economy”, which, according to a recent report, includes myriad such annoyances (spam, robocalls and unseen fees, as well as unhelpful chatbots). All this leaves “people feeling overwhelmed, ignored, or jerked around” and costs “wasted time and lost money”. The total? $165bn a year in the US alone. "}],[{"start":51.550000000000004,"text":"Some throw yet more money at the problem. Kath Clarke, who provides remote (human) personal assistants to clients, tells me that most requests are not for fancy holidays or high-end restaurant bookings, but “to take on the things [customers] absolutely dread: sitting on hold with the council, navigating endless customer service chatbots to sort a refund”."}],[{"start":72.35000000000001,"text":"Some annoyances might be accidental, stemming from dilapidated, byzantine systems, but others are deliberate, profitable for business but costly for the consumer. One woman phoned BBC Radio 4 to complain that, seven years after buying two pairs of leggings, she had discovered that the payment was not a one-off but a monthly subscription that eventually totalled £5,000. "}],[{"start":97.10000000000001,"text":"Such tactics have been referred to as “sludge” — the opposite of “nudge”, the theory coined by behavioural economists Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein to describe small tweaks in “choice architecture” that encourage people to become healthier or to save. Sludge, wrote Thaler, is “essentially nudging for evil”."}],[{"start":117.65,"text":"This form of annoyance thrives in the workplace, too. Convoluted expenses software deters staff from racking up costs, while bureaucratic management sucks unnecessary hours from the working week. "}],[{"start":129.9,"text":"According to Robert Sutton, co-author of The Friction Project, the best managers are those who see themselves as “trustees of others’ time”, seeking to reduce such sludge so staff can concentrate on their tasks. He cites one example of a senior manager at Google who decreed that written permission from him was required if any more than four job interviews were scheduled. "}],[{"start":151.55,"text":"Will technology help dial down the annoyance? Neale Mahoney, professor of economics at Stanford University and co-author of the “annoyance economy” report, tells me that he worries “AI will make things worse. Dark patterns tailored person by person. Scam calls that impersonate a family member’s voice. Back-end fees calibrated to the maximum amount we are willing to pay.”  "}],[{"start":175.15,"text":"Policies to deal with all this are a work in progress. Last year, Amazon agreed to pay $2.5bn in penalties and refunds after the US Federal Trade Commission found the tech company got millions of customers to subscribe to Prime, making it difficult to cancel. But André Spicer, co-author of The Art of Less, says government crackdowns typically provide relief in one area while sludge gets worse in others. "}],[{"start":202.65,"text":"For some, however, there are small pleasures to be had in turning annoyance into art. The Irish writer Ciaran O’Driscoll’s poem “Please Hold” encapsulates the specific hell of waiting on the phone, listening to “Eine Kleine Nachtmusik”. “The robot transfers me to himself. Your call is important to us, he says.” "}],[{"start":223.75,"text":"Or in small acts of sabotage, like the man who dealt with his frustrations by encouraging the robo-assistant he was arguing with to call its delivery firm the worst in the world before describing itself as a “useless chatbot that can’t help you”. Silly, yes. But the annoyed among us must find our joy where we can."}],[{"start":248.54999999999998,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1776589462_8721.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

大型科技公司为何在英国煽动动荡?

埃隆•马斯克在贝尔法斯特、南安普顿及更广泛地区放大反移民情绪的做法,不能仅用意识形态来解释。

乌克兰和平窗口不会永远敞开

目前有机会让这场冲突“冻结”,但普京对“完全胜利”的幻想可能会成为障碍。

拉丁美洲的世界杯球衣如何沦为政治工具

极右翼民粹主义者已经把自家阵营的队服当成标志性符号,而左翼正试图夺回这块阵地。

欧洲股票具备美国同行无法匹敌的“和平红利”

如果伊朗冲突引发的能源短缺缓解,欧洲公司在复苏方面将获益更多。

哈利•波特毁了英国

我们最宝贵的资产已经被魔法部挪用。

为什么我们彼此不再交流?

与聊天机器人对话永远无法带来同样的人类滋养。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×