Is China decoupling on food? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Is China decoupling on food?

If this is pursued with the same energy as industrial policy, it will upend the agricultural economy
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.4,"text":"The writer is an FT contributing editor and writes the Chartbook newsletter"}],[{"start":9.850000000000001,"text":"For China food is more than food. In a media system that is shy about sex and forbidden to debate politics, what so often takes centre stage are images of laden tables, bubbling hotpots and chillies tumbling into fragrant oil. Food is the China dream made real."}],[{"start":26.85,"text":"Feeding China is not just a matter of symbolism, it is geoeconomics on a grand scale. First and foremost, China feeds itself. The country is home to the largest grain and meat production system in the world. But it is also true that since WTO accession in 2001, it has become increasingly import-dependent. In the early 2020s China was estimated to rely on imports for one-third of its food supply, resulting in an agricultural commodities trade deficit of $124bn last year."}],[{"start":60.6,"text":"From a strictly economic point of view, reliance on world trade makes sense. Per capita, China has one-fifth of the arable land of the US. Water is scarce. Set against booming exports, food imports are a welcome balancing item. But import dependence also creates risks. Both the EU and the US are self-sufficient when it comes to food. The signs are that Beijing is increasingly uncomfortable with this disparity. The year started with a tariff on beef. The 15th Five-Year Plan further raised the priority of self-sufficiency. If food decoupling is pursued with the same energy as China’s industrial policy, it will upend the global agricultural economy of the last quarter century."}],[{"start":101.7,"text":"China’s import-dependent abundance contrasts sharply with its own past. Until 2000 the People’s Republic was poor but largely self-sufficient. Older generations of Chinese well remember the hungry years. As recently as 1994, environmentalist Lester Brown was asking anxiously, Who Will feed China?"}],[{"start":122.6,"text":"That question has been answered in spectacular style. China’s grain production has surged. Huge inputs of fertiliser have driven up yield per hectare. Generous pricing has resulted in the accumulation of vast stockpiles. In microeconomic terms this is inefficient. But grain stocks offer a comfort blanket. "}],[{"start":145.6,"text":"What they do not address is China’s dependence on imported protein and animal feed. As Chinese consumers grew more affluent between 1980 and 2020, animal protein consumption rose sixfold. For meat production to be based on imported animal feed was a political choice. It went hand in hand with China’s WTO accession. The chief beneficiaries were the US and Brazil."}],[{"start":171.15,"text":"Why, you might wonder, does China have anything to worry about? In the global food economy, it is a whale. It has huge buying power. And as its population shrinks, so too will the food imbalance. "}],[{"start":184.45000000000002,"text":"But for Xi Jinping food security is a core issue. In the 14th Five-Year Plan of 2021, food was singled out alongside energy and finance as a key pillar of national economic security. In 2022, with the war in Ukraine raging and global supply chains under threat, Xi’s speeches mentioned food security on average once every five days. This year, a revealing analysis by the research group Systemiq suggested that China may be gearing up to deploy the full repertoire of its “industrial playbook” on the question of food security."}],[{"start":220,"text":"This involves a combination of investment and innovation. Beijing is coordinating central and provincial government, state-owned enterprises and financial institutions around smart agriculture. It has licensed the commercialisation of genetically modified maize and soya. Research clusters are forming around neoproteins, fermentation-derived ingredients, feed additives and agricultural biotechnology. State banks are on hand to provide cheap finance. To channel demand, Beijing is tightening food and feed standards and tweaking procurement requirements."}],[{"start":255.05,"text":"This is the kind of whole-system policy that has given China a commanding lead in the new energy sectors. With all the levers in play, we may, by as early as 2030, see a significant fall in soyabean demand, slashing imports from the US dramatically. By 2040, innovation and efficiency gains could plausibly turn China into a net exporter of poultry, dairy, eggs, fish and seafood. If agriculture follows the industrial policy timeline, by 2050 we should expect to see China emerging as a major source of “cultivated meat”."}],[{"start":288.90000000000003,"text":"For agricultural exporters in the US and Brazil the implications are stark. Where will they find hundreds of millions of new consumers? The obvious places are South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, two world regions with the largest degree of food shortage. But that depends on economic growth turning human need into effective demand."}],[{"start":308.8,"text":"Beyond specific scenarios, the key point is simply this: the global division of labour as we know it today is of relatively recent vintage. It was shaped decades ago, largely around western supply chains. In food as in energy, this put China in the position of an importer. That has enabled abundance, but it also means accepting vulnerability, which Beijing won’t. Expect China to respond with a drive towards innovation. With regard to global development there is little to regret in this. The world needs more clean energy and it also needs new food. It is for the incumbents, “us” in other words, that China’s formidable drive for techno-industrial security brings radical uncertainty. "}],[{"start":357.95,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1777686711_2687.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

大型科技公司为何在英国煽动动荡?

埃隆•马斯克在贝尔法斯特、南安普顿及更广泛地区放大反移民情绪的做法,不能仅用意识形态来解释。

乌克兰和平窗口不会永远敞开

目前有机会让这场冲突“冻结”,但普京对“完全胜利”的幻想可能会成为障碍。

拉丁美洲的世界杯球衣如何沦为政治工具

极右翼民粹主义者已经把自家阵营的队服当成标志性符号,而左翼正试图夺回这块阵地。

欧洲股票具备美国同行无法匹敌的“和平红利”

如果伊朗冲突引发的能源短缺缓解,欧洲公司在复苏方面将获益更多。

哈利•波特毁了英国

我们最宝贵的资产已经被魔法部挪用。

为什么我们彼此不再交流?

与聊天机器人对话永远无法带来同样的人类滋养。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×