The Iran war dilemma for central bankers - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

The Iran war dilemma for central bankers

What happened after the pandemic is an imperfect guide for the latest shock
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.4,"text":"The Iran war has put central bankers in a bind. Nobody knows how long shipping in the Strait of Hormuz will remain disrupted for, and in turn how high global energy prices could ultimately rise. Households and businesses are, however, already feeling the pinch from dearer domestic fuels. Data released on Tuesday showed that annual growth in the US consumer price index jumped to 3.8 per cent in April, its highest in three years, and up from 2.4 per cent in February. "}],[{"start":34.45,"text":"If rate setters act too soon to contain inflationary pressures by raising the cost of credit, they risk adding insult to economic injury. If they hold steady to see how the conflict develops, there is a risk of waiting too long. Then they could be blamed for a surge in prices, similar to what happened in the aftermath of the pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. That said, central bankers are also aware that monetary policy is a rather blunt instrument for guiding prices through a volatile shock to energy supplies."}],[{"start":67.4,"text":"The strategy, so far, among major central banks has been to bide time. But the longer the conflict goes on, the more patience will thin, and the more hawkish policymakers will become. Last week, the Reserve Bank of Australia and Norges Bank bucked the trend by raising rates. And at their meetings last month the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England conveyed growing concern about the pass-through of higher energy costs into the economy. Kevin Warsh, who is set to replace outgoing Fed chair Jay Powell this week, will face stiff resistance from a Federal Open Market Committee that is anxious about inflation if he pushes for a rate cut to appease US President Donald Trump."}],[{"start":111.10000000000001,"text":"The worried hawks ought to be taken seriously. Rich nations are less dependent on fossil fuels than in decades past but the war — which has triggered the largest oil supply shock in history — has already led to a notable rise in prices. In the US, a net energy exporter, petrol costs have jumped over 50 per cent. The latest price shock could also lead to a longer-lasting jump in inflation expectations, particularly in the US and UK where central banks have struggled to get price growth sustainably back to their 2 per cent targets in recent years."}],[{"start":147.10000000000002,"text":"Nonetheless, concerns that policymakers are at risk of repeating the mistakes of 2022 — when central banks tightened too late and inflation surged — should be kept in perspective. Circumstances are different this time. Then, economies were rebounding from lockdowns and stimulated by generous policy support. Right now, economic momentum looks weaker and fiscal support has, sensibly, been more muted. Rising energy prices are also crimping demand, which could help contain inflation. A higher cost of credit on top, then, risks squeezing economies excessively. Similarly, job markets in the US and Europe contain more slack today, which means that higher inflation expectations are less likely to trigger an upward ratchet in wages and prices. Interest rates, too, are much less accommodative than they were in the aftermath of the pandemic. "}],[{"start":201.8,"text":"For now, then, it makes sense for the Fed, BoE and ECB to continue their holding pattern, with hawkish messaging to help keep a lid on inflation expectations. Policymakers will need to monitor closely how much the conflict is suppressing demand, and how quickly higher energy costs are feeding into broader price pressures. At the same time, they must keep tabs on developments in the strait, and the risk of under-pressure governments being forced into providing more cost of living support. Like everyone else, central bankers are trying to navigate through an economic outlook obscured by the fog of war in the Middle East."}],[{"start":246.2,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1778643157_3990.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

现代战争的血腥一如往昔

科技的进步并没有减少俄乌战争中的伤亡,武装无人机和AI正把前线变成险恶的杀戮地带,惨烈程度堪比一战。

帕拉贝利斯医药公司于与再生元达成交易次日披露IPO计划,上市热潮升温

成立已有十年且资金雄厚、从格雷格•维尔丁在哈佛实验室孵化出的“不可成药”生物技术公司——帕拉贝利斯医药公司,正寻求成为今年第12家进行首次公开募股的药物研发企业
20小时前

英伟达部署900亿美元助推AI繁荣

黄仁勋正成为依赖其芯片的AI相关公司的最大资助者之一。这些支出涉及逾145家公司,从AI模型开发商、云服务提供商到基础设施供应商不一而足。

Lex专栏:股市投资者信心爆棚,但现金见底

鉴于标普500指数高度依赖以人工智能为驱动的公司,股市出现小问题和大问题的可能性都很大。

FT社评:埃博拉疫情暴露全球应对大流行病准备不足

援助资金减少以及特朗普政府对全球公共卫生理念的敌意,正危及我们所有人。

“四大”急聘AI专业人才,岗位数量盖过传统审计师

全球最大的几家会计师事务所正竞相适应颠覆性的技术变革。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×