The Iran war dilemma for central bankers - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

The Iran war dilemma for central bankers

What happened after the pandemic is an imperfect guide for the latest shock
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.4,"text":"The Iran war has put central bankers in a bind. Nobody knows how long shipping in the Strait of Hormuz will remain disrupted for, and in turn how high global energy prices could ultimately rise. Households and businesses are, however, already feeling the pinch from dearer domestic fuels. Data released on Tuesday showed that annual growth in the US consumer price index jumped to 3.8 per cent in April, its highest in three years, and up from 2.4 per cent in February. "}],[{"start":34.45,"text":"If rate setters act too soon to contain inflationary pressures by raising the cost of credit, they risk adding insult to economic injury. If they hold steady to see how the conflict develops, there is a risk of waiting too long. Then they could be blamed for a surge in prices, similar to what happened in the aftermath of the pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. That said, central bankers are also aware that monetary policy is a rather blunt instrument for guiding prices through a volatile shock to energy supplies."}],[{"start":67.4,"text":"The strategy, so far, among major central banks has been to bide time. But the longer the conflict goes on, the more patience will thin, and the more hawkish policymakers will become. Last week, the Reserve Bank of Australia and Norges Bank bucked the trend by raising rates. And at their meetings last month the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England conveyed growing concern about the pass-through of higher energy costs into the economy. Kevin Warsh, who is set to replace outgoing Fed chair Jay Powell this week, will face stiff resistance from a Federal Open Market Committee that is anxious about inflation if he pushes for a rate cut to appease US President Donald Trump."}],[{"start":111.10000000000001,"text":"The worried hawks ought to be taken seriously. Rich nations are less dependent on fossil fuels than in decades past but the war — which has triggered the largest oil supply shock in history — has already led to a notable rise in prices. In the US, a net energy exporter, petrol costs have jumped over 50 per cent. The latest price shock could also lead to a longer-lasting jump in inflation expectations, particularly in the US and UK where central banks have struggled to get price growth sustainably back to their 2 per cent targets in recent years."}],[{"start":147.10000000000002,"text":"Nonetheless, concerns that policymakers are at risk of repeating the mistakes of 2022 — when central banks tightened too late and inflation surged — should be kept in perspective. Circumstances are different this time. Then, economies were rebounding from lockdowns and stimulated by generous policy support. Right now, economic momentum looks weaker and fiscal support has, sensibly, been more muted. Rising energy prices are also crimping demand, which could help contain inflation. A higher cost of credit on top, then, risks squeezing economies excessively. Similarly, job markets in the US and Europe contain more slack today, which means that higher inflation expectations are less likely to trigger an upward ratchet in wages and prices. Interest rates, too, are much less accommodative than they were in the aftermath of the pandemic. "}],[{"start":201.8,"text":"For now, then, it makes sense for the Fed, BoE and ECB to continue their holding pattern, with hawkish messaging to help keep a lid on inflation expectations. Policymakers will need to monitor closely how much the conflict is suppressing demand, and how quickly higher energy costs are feeding into broader price pressures. At the same time, they must keep tabs on developments in the strait, and the risk of under-pressure governments being forced into providing more cost of living support. Like everyone else, central bankers are trying to navigate through an economic outlook obscured by the fog of war in the Middle East."}],[{"start":246.2,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1778643157_3990.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

字节跳动的人工智能雄心

TikTok背后的中国公司正大举投资AI,希望成为横跨AI各个领域的领先集团。一些人认为这是一场豪赌。

“我的人生完蛋了”:AI泡沫破裂后,韩国投资者压力陡增

三星电子和SK海力士股价暴跌后,数百万人遭受“前所未有”的损失。

AI投资集中风险并不只存在于股票市场

库珀:债券市场与其他资产类别一样,正越来越被同一套AI投资逻辑主导。

普京的炼油厂梦想如何成为乌克兰的靶子

遭袭数月后,俄罗斯多家主要炼油厂的损毁在太空中仍清晰可见。

Lex专栏:英伟达的芯片或许新颖,但其“循环融资”并不新鲜

这家芯片制造商实际上是在开支票,帮助客户购买超出其原本支付能力的更多产品。

Lex专栏:现实冲击韩国存储芯片明星股

即便是最坚定的芯片繁荣论信徒,如今也必须正视其中的复杂性。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×