What is Jane Street? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

What is Jane Street?

The question is more important than the answer
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.5,"text":"Is it a hedge fund or a proprietary trading firm?"}],[{"start":7.9,"text":"A small but pedantic quarter of the finance internet has been discussing a question raised by Rupak Ghose on his Substack last week — Is Jane Street a prop trading firm, or a hedge fund? Was the hit it took during the Situational Awareness liquidation week the biggest trading loss in history, or just a medium-size fluctuation in AuM of the sort that happens from time to time?"}],[{"start":31.049999999999997,"text":"One way to answer the question might be by means of a sandwich chart:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":35.5,"text":"This feels unsatisfactory, though — the question deserves a deeper answer, as proprietary trading is in many ways more complicated and sophisticated than sandwiches. The definitive answer, as it is with so many of these kinds of questions (like “Are stablecoins banks?”) should really be something like “nobody who matters is confused about what it actually does, so why waste time on semantics”. "}],[{"start":58.6,"text":"But as with most semantic debates, although the answer is almost always kind of unsatisfying, the process can be important. "}],[{"start":65.95,"text":"That’s because people do think about prop trading firms in a different way from hedge funds (and stablecoins in a different way from banks), and identifying the criteria which define one against another can sharpen up your intuitions about what might actually be important to know about a firm like Jane Street."}],[{"start":84,"text":"Is it an open-ended fund structure? An extremely significant taxonomical principle for financial institutions is “those that are subject to something like bank runs” versus “those which aren’t”. If something faces liquidity risk, then it can be a source of contagion; a loss of confidence can force it into behaviour which would otherwise be economically irrational, and which potentially causes trouble for other market players."}],[{"start":110.35,"text":"Where does it get its leverage from? This question is related to the previous one, because there are two ways to be subject to liquidity risk — open-ended liability structures, and short-term borrowing. Hedge funds usually get their leverage through collateralised margin loans subject to immediate calls; prop trading firms generally try to only leverage up on longer-term debt, precisely so that they can’t be squeezed out of positions."}],[{"start":136,"text":"Does it close positions overnight? Most of the very most horrible things that can happen to an investment portfolio happen while the market is closed. There is a very big difference between risks which you can trade out of, and risks that you can’t."}],[{"start":151.35,"text":"And finally, does it earn a compound return? This is probably the most important one, because it determines whether it’s going to grow over time or not. Prop trading firms might have very high returns on capital, but that capital has to be distributed to the owners and shareholders rather than reinvested. If something is capable of compounding, then it’s doing something quite different from the historic prop trading model, which was limited to the size of its market niche."}],[{"start":176.85,"text":"These questions, particularly the last one, focus on the potential risks posed by the two kinds of firms to the rest of the market. Prop trading firms usually get a fairly light touch from regulators and are often treated by incumbent banks as useful counterparties rather than an existential threat, even when they take very large market share. "}],[{"start":197.35,"text":"A large part of the reason for this is that the prop shop business model, in its traditional form, is intrinsically limited in its ability to do damage to the system as a whole. That’s the important thing to focus on when looking at entities like Jane Street — if, heaven forbid, they blew up, what would they take with them?"}],[{"start":216.65,"text":"Further reading:"}],[{"start":218.20000000000002,"text":"— Hedge funds and high-frequency traders are converging (FTAV)"}],[{"start":228.50000000000003,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1787324018_4604.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

民主党横扫中期选举,华尔街大金主押注失利

顶级对冲基金经理和私募股权投资公司高管为共和党竞选活动投入逾3亿美元,却几乎未见成效。
3小时前

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×