The rules of AI etiquette - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

The rules of AI etiquette

Just because a bot can do something for you doesn’t mean it should
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.28,"text":"Once upon a time, the basic rules of workplace etiquette were well understood."}],[{"start":9.28,"text":"Don’t take credit for someone else’s work. Don’t waste other people’s time by being late. Try to thank anyone who has done something to make your life easier. And so on."}],[{"start":18.88,"text":"The arrival of AI has added uncertainty to proceedings."}],[{"start":22.44,"text":"This month, Deloitte released a survey of 25,000 workers in the UK that it claimed was the largest study of workplace generative AI use ever carried out in a single country."}],[{"start":33.36,"text":"It showed that 63 per cent of us are using AI tools at work, mostly for three reasons: to search for information, write emails and summarise stuff."}],[{"start":43.2,"text":"The first of these poses few problems. The fact that ChatGPT can find studies and data in seconds that I would struggle to locate elsewhere helps me and offends no one."}],[{"start":53.44,"text":"Emails are another matter. AI’s view on how I might like to reply to a work email has improved since its chirpy early suggestions of “Love it!” and “Awesome!” — phrases I almost never use."}],[{"start":65.48,"text":"But the more sober versions it has come up with lately are still far from perfect. Too often they are cold, robotic or not quite what I would write. I never use them because I feel sure that anyone receiving them would suspect AI had had a hand in writing them, and might therefore think I was lazy, rude or both."}],[{"start":84,"text":"It turns out this is a reasonable assumption. “People can detect AI really easily,” says Myka Meier, founder of the Beaumont Etiquette firm that offers professional conduct training to large businesses across the globe."}],[{"start":96.6,"text":"Its relatively new AI etiquette courses are popular, she told me, and emphasise the importance of the personal, aka human, touch."}],[{"start":104.88,"text":"AI’s ability to summarise long documents also needs to be treated with caution, not least by managers."}],[{"start":111.24,"text":"I sympathise with time-starved bosses for whom AI summaries offer great temptation. But a friend recently showed me an email her manager had sent as part of a regular performance review."}],[{"start":121.78,"text":"A lengthy discussion the pair had held had been reduced to a few stilted paragraphs that reeked of AI and glossed over many of what my friend said were her most important achievements and goals."}],[{"start":132.6,"text":"The lesson here is clear. It is one thing to rely on AI summaries of lengthy transcripts or reports that only you are relying on, but another if you are condensing information of importance to someone else as well."}],[{"start":144.14,"text":"In that case, quietly using AI smacks of a lack of care and attention."}],[{"start":148.96,"text":"The same goes for another egregious breach of AI etiquette: sending AI-assisted work to a colleague, such as a reply to a customer or an assessment of a rival, without first checking it is all accurate."}],[{"start":160.3,"text":"This is a quick way to transfer work from yourself to someone else, and it has become alarmingly common. More than a third of US workers say they have been on the receiving end of colleagues’ workslop, which costs them more than three hours a month to fix and makes them understandably angry."}],[{"start":176.18,"text":"This raises another aspect of AI etiquette that does not get as much attention as it should: being transparent about using AI tools."}],[{"start":183.68,"text":"Burdening people with workslop is bad enough. Recording an online meeting without warning all participants is far worse."}],[{"start":190.12,"text":"Yet the share of meetings being recorded has been soaring. So too is the practice of sending an AI note taker to a meeting without alerting the humans gathered. It is not unknown for people to turn up to meetings to find themselves outnumbered by AI note-taking bots."}],[{"start":204.68,"text":"Again, a small amount of human communication goes a long way. If you explain beforehand that you have an unavoidable clash but would still like to use a note-taker if all agree, that may be acceptable."}],[{"start":215.18,"text":"If you don’t, you risk looking presumptuous and rude."}],[{"start":218.6,"text":"Ultimately, these rules are not hard to understand. They differ little from what has always been required. Before AI made bots so cheap and easy to use, would you have ever gone to a meeting room and left your phone on the table to record the conversation while you headed off for lunch? No. Me neither. Just because tech makes something possible does not make it acceptable. One day this will be obvious. In the meantime, we must muddle on as best we can."}],[{"start":243.12,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1790483994_6327.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×