EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

比英伟达还贵的印尼“爆炒股”

印尼监管机构表示,正就“广泛范围内的潜在市场不当行为”展开调查。

FT社评:美国生活成本挤压将长期存在

对于战争的冲击,美国经济仍比多数经济体更具韧性,但中低收入家庭将最容易受到影响。

美国将同样面临石油冲击风险

在全球原油市场上,亚洲买家正大量收购供应,推高欧洲和美国的价格。

战争导致的税收政策收紧将俄罗斯中小企业推至崩溃边缘

随着莫斯科将增值税提高至22%并大幅削减对中小企业的税收减免,小企业主难以维持运营。

投资者质疑OpenAI的8520亿美元估值

投资者担心,OpenAI的战略调整可能让该公司在准备上市之际更容易受到Anthropic和谷歌的冲击。

伊朗外交使命是万斯的“金杯毒酒”

长期以来一直抨击美国在海外军事干预的万斯,如今已成为推动结束这场冲突的代表人物。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×