EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国调低期望寻求达成更有限的贸易协议

总统暂停征收对等关税的90天将于7月9日到期。

美国能源集团斥巨资建造发电厂为数据中心供电

资本支出的增加引发了消费者对能源价格上涨的担忧。

特朗普的威胁促使加拿大加快破除国内贸易壁垒

特朗普关税威胁让加拿大政府有了动力去取消配额、税收以及相互矛盾的标准,削弱内部贸易壁垒,促进商品和劳动力的自由流动。

俄罗斯对乌克兰进行开战以来最大规模空袭

俄罗斯在一夜之间共发射537件空中武器,以及60枚各型导弹。泽连斯基呼吁西方在防御系统方面提供更多帮助。

脏话的力量与荣耀

特朗普喜欢说脏话,这种做法粗俗、不具总统风范,却非常有效。

以色列1967和伊朗2025:站在核武器门槛上的国家

20世纪60年代,面对生存威胁,以色列曾紧急组装了一枚原子装置。如今,伊朗会如何选择?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×