EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:锡——从罐头材料变身AI热潮关键金属

锡价上涨正促使一些矿商押注于这种看起来极为平常的金属,重新开始采掘工作。

“飞机不能空着飞”:航空公司为“寒冬”做准备

在担忧航空煤油价格持续高企的阴影下,航空业在巴西召开年度大会。

澳大利亚试图解决住房危机

澳大利亚总理阿尔巴尼斯正试图扭转延续数十年的税收激励措施,让年轻人买得起房。

美联储将不得不重新审视其全球角色

美国央行在帮助稳定他国的财政状况时,作出的不仅是经济决策,同时也是外交决策。

“先租后付”贷款瞄准居住成本重压下的美国人

在住房负担能力危机加剧之际,短期融资需求正在向租赁市场扩张。

在数据中心抢建狂潮中,AI“卖铲人”赚得盆满钵满

卡特彼勒与豪赫蒂夫等老牌工业股告别沉闷,在AI 热潮推动下迎来大涨。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×