EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

特朗普媒体收购核聚变公司:金融与核聚变的共通之处

Lex专栏:现金随处可得,但股市的热情却是稀缺的礼物。煤炭与现金壳已过时,如今当红的是聚变和炒作。
8小时前

普京就欧盟冻结资产发出报复威胁 欧盟各国感到不安

意大利、比利时和奥地利担心俄罗斯针对其企业采取行动。

派拉蒙与Netflix为争夺华纳兄弟探索的角力

华纳兄弟探索拒绝了派拉蒙的收购要约,为这场可能重塑好莱坞的收购拉锯战再添变数。

Lex专栏:马斯克收购推特的剧本无助于华纳兄弟收购案

华纳兄弟探索希望拉里•埃里森提供万无一失的个人担保,就像马斯克在收购推特时所做的那样。

万斯力挺特朗普经济政策,试图扭转舆论风向

美国副总统呼吁民众在生活成本负担能力问题上保持耐心,他还把美国顽固的通胀归咎于前总统拜登。

风向逆转:生活成本负担能力问题让特朗普陷入困境

美国总统将生活成本负担能力问题斥为“骗局”,遭遇民众的强烈反弹。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×