登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Why the world must agree to regulate AI

A technological disarmament pact between the US and China would make everyone feel more secure

Last week I asked whether AI is a bubble, boon or bane. My answers were, in order, “up to a point, yes, and yes”. Now, I want to consider the last query, about “banes” more deeply. The issues I will consider are: just how dangerous is AI, what should we do to contain it and will any form of regulation work? My main conclusions will be that it is definitely dangerous, we should certainly try to regulate it, and yet, in all probability, the attempt will fail.Some have told me I have no right to comment because I am no expert. Others argue that we must embrace whatever technology gives us, because it is the source of economic growth. Both views are wrong. A democracy is a shared political project. We all have a right to participate in debates on how to manage dangerous new technologies.

This was true when the atomic bomb was invented. It is also true of AI, which will have far more complex, yet also perilous, consequences. Moreover, the purported right to decide such things claimed by some tech titans was surely lost after the huge damage done by social media to the young and the public good of sound information.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

读者评论

用户名:
FT中文网欢迎读者发表评论,部分评论会被选进《读者有话说》栏目。我们保留编辑与出版的权利。
用户名
密码

马丁•沃尔夫

马丁•沃尔夫(Martin Wolf) 是英国《金融时报》副主编及首席经济评论员。为嘉奖他对财经新闻作出的杰出贡献,沃尔夫于2000年荣获大英帝国勋爵位勋章(CBE)。他是牛津大学纳菲尔德学院客座研究员,并被授予剑桥大学圣体学院和牛津经济政策研究院(Oxonia)院士,同时也是诺丁汉大学特约教授。自1999年和2006年以来,他分别担任达沃斯(Davos)每年一度“世界经济论坛”的特邀评委成员和国际传媒委员会的成员。2006年7月他荣获诺丁汉大学文学博士;在同年12月他又荣获伦敦政治经济学院科学(经济)博士荣誉教授的称号。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×