Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson

From Rowan Hill, Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

Like a lot of people, I’ve been dabbling with OpenAI’s ChatGPT with varying seriousness for about 12 months.

“Make me a 12-week marathon training plan”, “Create me a six-week marathon training plan”, “Make a photo of me as the next Pope”, “Is it possible to run a marathon without any training?”

When the platform went kaput this month, I was midway through writing an application for a voluntary role with an academic magazine. I’ve scoffed at accounts of students using artificial intelligence to get through college, deriding them for only cheating themselves. In my own much superior and honest scholarly pursuits, I only ever used it to source articles . . . or plan . . . and sometimes reference . . . or clean up those long sentences that don’t really go anywhere, nor make the point you want to make, but roll on and on for far too long, eating up word count.

As a result of the blackout, however, I ended up with two very different halves of an application. The first, produced with ChatGPT’s help, sounded like something I’d written, if you ignored a few of the more exotic word choices and overlooked the box-ticking style of the answers. It did everything the question had asked of it, and it wasn’t necessarily a fabrication.

The second wasn’t as polished. Pulitzer-worthy accounts of my leadership and prowess in adversity made way for honest accounts of my achievements. Sentences were clipped and to the point. At the end, I realised there were a few ideas that I’d missed but just couldn’t shoehorn them in. But it was definitely me talking about me.

An obsession with performance is continuously being maximised, from schools to the workplace to public services. But at what cost? Tim Harford’s Undercover Economist column “Shared values over profit” (Spectrum, June 7) and his account of Alasdair MacIntyre’s “tale of two fishing crews”, illustrated the perils of this fascination excellently. The first crew is driven by nothing but profit. The second allows time for the cultivation of character and human connection within the team, yet often comes out on top.

ChatGPT’s outage opened my own eyes to how I’d sleepwalked, slowly but surely, into believing maximum utility was somehow better than sticking to my values. This dilemma isn’t just an issue for business; it’s a challenge for individuals too.

Rowan Hill

Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

欧洲风机制造商探讨合并,抗衡中国对手

欧盟更新并购审查指南之际,中国竞争压力或将推动行业并购。

特朗普压低油价的能力受到考验

黑格:随着伊朗冲突一拖再拖,口头干预或已不足以抑制油价。

朝韩竞相建造核动力潜艇

去年获得唐纳德•特朗普首肯后,韩国看到了发展更强大潜艇的机会。

电子价签之争凸显美国经济焦虑

新泽西州成为首个叫停电子价签的州,原因是担心这些价签会将动态定价机制引入杂货店,甚至监视顾客。

一周展望:美联储会加息吗?

投资者本周还将密切关注英国央行可能如何应对通胀再度抬头的迹象。

使用Kimi K3等中国开源AI模型有何风险?

萨克斯:真正的问题不在于海外开源,而在于缺乏保护基础设施的协调机制来应对网络攻击。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×