Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson

From Rowan Hill, Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

Like a lot of people, I’ve been dabbling with OpenAI’s ChatGPT with varying seriousness for about 12 months.

“Make me a 12-week marathon training plan”, “Create me a six-week marathon training plan”, “Make a photo of me as the next Pope”, “Is it possible to run a marathon without any training?”

When the platform went kaput this month, I was midway through writing an application for a voluntary role with an academic magazine. I’ve scoffed at accounts of students using artificial intelligence to get through college, deriding them for only cheating themselves. In my own much superior and honest scholarly pursuits, I only ever used it to source articles . . . or plan . . . and sometimes reference . . . or clean up those long sentences that don’t really go anywhere, nor make the point you want to make, but roll on and on for far too long, eating up word count.

As a result of the blackout, however, I ended up with two very different halves of an application. The first, produced with ChatGPT’s help, sounded like something I’d written, if you ignored a few of the more exotic word choices and overlooked the box-ticking style of the answers. It did everything the question had asked of it, and it wasn’t necessarily a fabrication.

The second wasn’t as polished. Pulitzer-worthy accounts of my leadership and prowess in adversity made way for honest accounts of my achievements. Sentences were clipped and to the point. At the end, I realised there were a few ideas that I’d missed but just couldn’t shoehorn them in. But it was definitely me talking about me.

An obsession with performance is continuously being maximised, from schools to the workplace to public services. But at what cost? Tim Harford’s Undercover Economist column “Shared values over profit” (Spectrum, June 7) and his account of Alasdair MacIntyre’s “tale of two fishing crews”, illustrated the perils of this fascination excellently. The first crew is driven by nothing but profit. The second allows time for the cultivation of character and human connection within the team, yet often comes out on top.

ChatGPT’s outage opened my own eyes to how I’d sleepwalked, slowly but surely, into believing maximum utility was somehow better than sticking to my values. This dilemma isn’t just an issue for business; it’s a challenge for individuals too.

Rowan Hill

Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

杨立昆的AI初创公司瞄准30亿欧元估值

从Meta离职的图灵奖得主正就筹集5亿欧元进行初步洽谈,计划于1月启动。

关于AI与大型科技公司的两种观点

AI带来的改变究竟有多大?

石头科技押注AI“清扫”扫地机器人市场

石头科技负责人称,机械臂和宠物狗粪识别等创新是生存关键。

卫星影像追踪特朗普对委内瑞拉施压的行动

照片、数据与视频显示,对尼古拉斯•马杜罗的军事压力不断升级,此前美国总统拒绝排除动武的可能。

预测市场与2025年的赌场心态

金融游戏化颠覆了传统的信任与监管格局。

体育赛事门票为何高得离谱?

围绕国际足联世界杯票价引发的喧嚣,最鲜明地凸显了疫情后“体验型”需求激增所带来的紧张关系。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×