Meta launches fresh legal challenge over UK’s Online Safety Act - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
商业快报

Meta launches fresh legal challenge over UK’s Online Safety Act

US tech giant’s latest action against regulator Ofcom could slow down implementation of the far-reaching law
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":7.56,"text":"Meta is pursuing a fresh legal challenge against Ofcom over the Online Safety Act, the latest move against the UK media regulator by US tech companies in what British officials and politicians fear may slow down implementation of the far-reaching law."}],[{"start":22.56,"text":"This week, Ofcom was served with papers by the Upper Tribunal over an appeal by Meta against so-called ‘categorisation’ under the Act that subjects WhatsApp and Instagram to additional regulatory duties. These include protecting users from fraudulent ads and increased reporting on the handling of illegal content."}],[{"start":40.88,"text":"Meta argues that so-called Category 1 duties are not designed for private one-to-one and small-group messaging. Roblox and Quora are also challenging Ofcom over the categorisation of their services."}],[{"start":53.48,"text":"Ofcom is already facing judicial reviews in two other areas from Meta, the parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, which were lodged in the High Court this year and have court dates in October, alongside legal challenges from other tech firms."}],[{"start":68.04,"text":"Officials and politicians are worried that tech companies are trying to slow down implementation of the Act through the courts. The Online Safety Act, which protects children from harmful and pornographic content, is backed by a wide spectrum of the public."}],[{"start":81.52,"text":"Damian Collins, former junior minister for tech and the digital economy in the previous Conservative government, said: “It’s clearly a deliberate strategy by Meta to frustrate and delay the implementation of the Online Safety Act. It is a form of lawfare to tie up the regulator. The law is clear and it is what parliament wanted.”"}],[{"start":100.56,"text":"He added that big tech companies had “limitless resources” that could be used against the regulator, adding that the government needed to support Ofcom with more funding. “The legislation is what the British people clearly want.”"}],[{"start":null,"text":"

Lisa Nandy smiles as she arrives holding a red folder while a photographer takes her picture outside a building.
"}],[{"start":112.56,"text":"This week, Lisa Nandy, culture secretary, complained about Ofcom’s enforcement of the Online Safety Act, saying “it has been incredibly slow . . . we want to see Ofcom enforcing the law more robustly and more quickly”."}],[{"start":124.96,"text":"Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom group director for online safety, on Tuesday told a Lords committee that the regulator was also “underwhelmed” with progress and that it was operating in a “highly litigious environment”."}],[{"start":136.28,"text":"The law came into force in stages from April 2025 but is not expected to be fully implemented until next year."}],[{"start":144.96,"text":"Another of Meta’s legal actions is a challenge to the fees and potential fines introduced under the Online Safety Act."}],[{"start":151.72,"text":"Ofcom’s operating costs for enforcing the rules are funded by tech firms, with fees based on a company’s qualifying worldwide revenue. But Meta argues that this is set at a disproportionate level and not linked to its UK services, which means larger companies bear the majority of Ofcom’s costs."}],[{"start":170.96,"text":"Meta also objects to using that qualifying worldwide revenue or £18mn, whichever is greater, to decide the fines of up to 10 per cent levied against companies that break the rules. A full hearing is expected in October."}],[{"start":185.74,"text":"Industry insiders say the fees and fines are consistent with what happens with the UK telecoms industry, arguing that the threat needs to be sufficient for the law to be taken seriously by US tech giants."}],[{"start":197.68,"text":"Another legal challenge, which is also being fought by TikTok and X, concerns how much information the platforms need to give to the regulator to carry out its job of monitoring their services."}],[{"start":209.28,"text":"The UK’s Online Safety Act gives Ofcom powers to demand internal data and documentation from tech companies to ensure they are protecting users and monitoring harmful content. Meta, TikTok and X argue the scale of some of the information requests goes beyond what is permitted under the Act or is necessary and proportionate."}],[{"start":229.68,"text":"An Ofcom spokesperson said: “Parliament has charged us with the job of regulating an industry that has been unregulated and unaccountable for more than 20 years.”"}],[{"start":239.36,"text":"They added: “Meta, X and TikTok are challenging our efforts to gather information from them. Meta is challenging us on our ability to set fees and maximum fines. Separately, Roblox, WhatsApp, Instagram and Quora are appealing our decisions in July to designate them as category 1 services. On all these fronts, we will robustly defend our reasoning and decisions.”"}],[{"start":261.28,"text":"A Meta spokesperson said: “Like many others in the industry, including TikTok, Roblox, X and Quora, we are challenging specific aspects of implementation.”"}],[{"start":270.44,"text":"They added: “These are not challenges to the law itself, but how Ofcom has interpreted it. This is a normal feature of any new regulatory regime being bedded in and ensures questions of process, scope and implementation get settled so the law is applied proportionately, accurately and consistently.”"}],[{"start":288.92,"text":"TikTok said it had “committed significant resources to ongoing compliance” and its challenge was “on a narrow issue regarding Ofcom’s implementation of a substantial extra-statutory programme not mandated by law”."}],[{"start":306.84,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1789902811_7469.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×