UK universities told to go analogue to stop AI cheating - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
商业快报

UK universities told to go analogue to stop AI cheating

Office for Students says technology poses ‘generational risk’ to sector’s integrity and reputation
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":8.56,"text":"Universities are too vulnerable to AI cheating and need to adopt tech-proof assessment methods like paper exams and oral presentations, England’s higher education regulator has warned."}],[{"start":19.62,"text":"The Office for Students said that the technology posed a “generational risk” to the integrity and reputation of universities, threatening to issue fines and other disciplinary action if they cannot effectively prevent students from abusing AI."}],[{"start":34.32,"text":"While acknowledging the “huge opportunity” for AI to help improve teaching, the regulator says that universities need to do far more to prevent cheating from being normalised and undermining students’ ability to learn."}],[{"start":46.84,"text":"Student surveys suggest that more than 90 per cent of them are using AI to help with assignments, prompting some universities to redesign assessments, including a revival of medieval-era viva voce oral examinations."}],[{"start":60.12,"text":"In a report published on Wednesday, the OfS said approaches “vary widely” between institutions, acknowledging criticism that the regulator itself had been slow to set out clear rules since the emergence of ChatGPT four years ago."}],[{"start":73.94,"text":"It praised some universities for redesigning assessments but said too many still relied on unsupervised coursework that is highly vulnerable to the abuse of AI."}],[{"start":84.04,"text":"Students frequently reported that some of their peers “had completed assessments using AI, sometimes in just a few minutes, and received a similar grade to those who had completed the assessment themselves”, the OfS report said."}],[{"start":96.72,"text":"Many students “see AI as the most effective route to a high grade” and “feel they are at a disadvantage” if they do not use it the powerful technology themselves."}],[{"start":107.04,"text":"Academics reported that they regularly saw work written in the same style and using the same references, with some responses claiming that “coursework is now overwhelmingly written in part or exclusively with the help of AI”."}],[{"start":120.4,"text":"Josh Fleming, director of strategy at the OfS, said that AI “presents a generational risk to the system” and undermines the ability of universities to assess students fairly."}],[{"start":131.12,"text":"“We need to see far greater efforts to tackle these risks, including far greater use of AI-free assessment,” he added."}],[{"start":136.68,"text":"AI detection software was not reliable enough to be used in disciplinary action, Fleming said, adding: “It’s much better to design the assessment such that it’s not even an option to cheat.”"}],[{"start":148.52,"text":"The OfS has now issued new guidance which urges universities to make greater use of “secure assessments” such as in-person exams, presentations and vivas."}],[{"start":158.66,"text":"Under an overhauled quality regime, universities must demonstrate “that assessments are designed in such a way to be resilient against AI”."}],[{"start":167.18,"text":"The report did stress that, when used appropriately, AI could help give rapid personalised feedback and allow lecturers to develop better teaching materials."}],[{"start":177.04,"text":"Fleming urged universities to “get ahead of this and not wait for the regulator to come and find the issue”."}],[{"start":183.42,"text":"He praised the University of Bath for its “two-lane approach”, which includes exams where students cannot access AI and other assessments explicitly designed on the assumption that the technology will be used."}],[{"start":195.84,"text":"Universities UK said many institutions “have made substantial changes to how they assess students”."}],[{"start":201.68,"text":"“This includes more in-person exams, presentations, vivas, process-based assessment and assessments that integrate AI in a controlled way,” it added."}],[{"start":211.72,"text":"“Different subjects will require different approaches, and universities should have the flexibility to adopt assessment methods that best support learning outcomes.”"}],[{"start":224.61,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1794387303_7031.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

黄仁勋会出售价值1350亿美元的股票吗?

英伟达联合创始人若试图减持股份,势必令投资者不安,但此举也面临法律和股价风险。

黄仁勋的伊卡洛斯时刻

AI亿万富翁是否飞得离太阳太近?

为什么择时交易是愚蠢之举(给自己的提醒)

近期股债价格剧烈波动,恰好提醒人们此时不宜采取行动。

贝森特指责卢特尼克领导的商务部未能将超速国际列入黑名单

美国财政部长的猛烈抨击可能加剧特朗普政府内部因英伟达丑闻引发的紧张关系。

AI智能体不应被迫冒充用户

从银行到在线平台的服务提供商都需要以公平条件提供标准化接入渠道。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×