Dutch government averts collapse after Wilders backs down - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
荷兰

Dutch government averts collapse after Wilders backs down

Far-right leader reverses at last minute on emergency law to curb immigration

The Dutch government has averted collapse over migration policy after far-right leader Geert Wilders backed down over a demand for drastic measures potentially in breach of EU law.

His Freedom party, one of the four coalition partners in the Netherlands, scrapped a plan to declare a migration crisis, which would have allowed the adoption of further measures without parliamentary consent.

Instead, centre-right coalition partner New Social Contract convinced Wilders to settle for a draconian refugee policy set to be approved by the cabinet on Friday, which will have to be endorsed by parliament.

These include cutting residency rights for refugees from five to three years, allowing some to be returned to parts of Syria, scrapping quotas for housing refugees, and reintroducing border controls as Germany has done, two party officials told the Financial Times.

The compromise is the latest attempt by centrist forces in the three-month old government to rein in anti-Islam firebrand Wilders, whose party won the most seats in last year’s election, sending shockwaves through the EU.

But even as the cabinet’s break up had been averted for now, it remained a strong probability, said Sarah de Lange, politics professor at the University of Amsterdam.

“The government might last a little longer. However, it is becoming increasingly unstable due to the lack of competence displayed by various Freedom party ministers.”

The latest was a visit to Uganda by trade minister Reinette Klaver last week when she said the Netherlands could send failed asylum seekers to the country. 

Prime Minister Dick Schoof, who is not a member of any of the four coalition partners, knew nothing about the plan in advance and was forced to defend it as a “serious idea” at his first EU summit.

The next day, Uganda’s foreign minister told Dutch radio the subject wasn’t discussed, only “Dutch support for refugees who are already in Uganda”.

The government’s actions are “shameful”, said Jesse Klaver, leader of the Greens — an opposition party that together with the Dutch Labour party is the second-largest bloc in the national parliament.

“The fiercest opposition the prime minister gets is from Wilders, not from the opposition, because we try to come up with plans and ideas and have a real debate.

“But Wilders just goes after him and in a very arrogant way.

“These centre-right parties enabled the new radical right party to be in the centre of power of the Netherlands. And that’s unique. I hope this is a once in a lifetime [event].”

The other three parties in government say they had little choice but to work with Wilders as he won the most seats. They blocked the veteran MP, who lives in a safe house and is guarded round the clock because of death threats, from being prime minister. Now he is acting “like he’s still in opposition”, said Klaver.

Rob Jetten, leader of D66, a liberal party that ended Mark Rutte’s government last year when he tried to tighten migration policy, said the new team achieved little in their first 100 days except budget cuts.

Billions of euros were slashed from education, health and research in September’s budget.

“We have had 100 days of fighting within the coalition, both in the government and between the coalition parties. 

“We’ve been talking about the so-called migration crisis now for three months and literally nothing, nothing has happened. They’re not delivering.”

But Dirk Gotink, a member of the European parliament from NSC, said the government was tackling the failures of Rutte’s coalition. 

The country’s sole asylum holding centre was overwhelmed, the budget deficit was growing and the country was breaching nitrogen pollution limits. Gotink said the budget deficit was scheduled to hit 3 per cent, the maximum allowed under EU rules, and the budget cut it to 2.5 per cent.

“The last government spent away their political disagreements by funding everything. We have to be ready for the next economic shock.”

De Lange says Wilders would welcome a snap vote but does not want to be the cause of government collapse. In Dutch politics, “the breaker pays”, she said. 

“He has to strike a delicate balance between showing he is principled and responsible, all while steering towards new elections so that NSC will implode and a three party coalition in which Wilders has the upper hand can be formed.”

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×