The Fed’s not making a profit - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 中央银行

The Fed’s not making a profit

In these unusual times, Congress and the White House should be clear what they plan to do about a loss
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.43,"text":"The writer is an FT contributing editor"}],[{"start":8.51,"text":"This month the Federal Reserve decided it would cut its own workforce by a tenth over the next several years. The move has been reported as a way to find savings at the Fed before the so-called Department of Government Efficiency knocks on the door. That may be right, but the Fed has another problem it doesn’t like to talk about: it’s operating at a loss. On purpose."}],[{"start":36.3,"text":"When a commercial bank lends you money, it’s adding both an asset and a liability to its own balance sheet. The asset is the loan itself, which you will repay over time. The liability is brand-new deposits, which it marks up from scratch in your account. Those deposits are brand-new money."}],[{"start":57.75,"text":"The Federal Reserve is a special bank, but it’s still a bank. When it adds assets to its own balance sheet like treasuries or mortgage-backed securities, it matches those with liabilities — either brand-new physical dollar notes or brand-new deposits. We call deposits at the Fed reserves, but they’re just deposits. There is no magic to this, no special money creation. It’s just banking."}],[{"start":86.64,"text":"The point of a commercial bank is to operate at a profit, keeping returns on assets higher than the costs of liabilities. But macroeconomists have come to believe that this just isn’t true of the Fed. It issues dollars and can always issue more, therefore losses don’t matter. But this is an assumption, not a law of physics. What it misses is the political importance of seigniorage — the profit to the sovereign nation’s coffers for manufacturing money."}],[{"start":118.93,"text":"Until 2023, the Fed consistently made a profit. The returns on its assets were higher than the costs of its liabilities. It returned some of this profit to the government, demonstrating its strength both as a bank and as political institution. It is easier to remain independent of the White House when you’re the one paying for the privilege."}],[{"start":142.36,"text":"The Fed’s liabilities used to cost it nothing. First, even though physical dollar notes are a liability for the Fed, they don’t pay interest. Second, commercial banks have always had to hold some of their assets as deposits at the Fed — reserves. The Fed didn’t pay interest on these either, until a 2006 law, implemented during the beginning of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. "}],[{"start":170.44,"text":"Traditionally, bankers have felt about holding reserves the way children feel about taking a bath. They’re against it, but that’s not really the point, because it’s not their decision. Reserves aren’t supposed to be profitable — they’re supposed to be safe. Once the Fed started paying interest on reserves, however, this necessity didn’t seem that painful. Banks got used to holding a safe asset with a small but guaranteed return. They started holding way more reserves than they needed to."}],[{"start":203.82,"text":"Now the Fed is stuck in an operating system it calls the ample-reserves regime, one where bankers love bath time. Under this regime, the Fed carries out interest-rate policy by moving the interest it pays on reserves up and down. It decides, essentially, how much to lose on its liabilities. This isn’t quantitative easing in an emergency, it’s just normal operations. In 2023, the Fed reported a loss of $114bn; in 2024, $78bn."}],[{"start":241.41,"text":"This is a departure without a discussion. The reason we assume the Fed cannot possibly fail is that Congress will always protect its central bank with the promise of new capital in an emergency. Now, in perfectly normal years, the Fed can incur losses when it raises its rates."}],[{"start":261,"text":"The Fed books these losses as what it calls deferred assets, a note of how much profit it will have to earn back before it can start paying its contribution to the Department of the Treasury again. This is a privilege unique to the Fed, a tacit understanding that there will be lean and fat years, which will balance each other out as rates fall again in the future."}],[{"start":287.64,"text":"The profit the Fed makes on issuing dollar cash may be going away as well. Cash continues to decline as a share of total payments. The White House and Republicans in Congress have made clear that the Fed is not to replace dollar cash on its own balance sheet with any other kind of liability, such as a digital currency."}],[{"start":310.58,"text":"At the same time, a bill in the Senate would instead bring stablecoins providers into a regulatory regime where they have to hold assets against every coin in either Treasuries, reserves at the Fed, insured bank deposits, or treasury repurchase agreements. This means over the long term, the Fed’s profits on cash are moving to the private sector."}],[{"start":336.08,"text":"None of this mattered in normal times, when the Fed was supported by a consensus with Congress and the White House on the norms of monetary policy. But these are not normal times. The Federal Reserve is a bank. And we should be clear about exactly whose bank it is, whether Congress and the White House expect a profit, and what they plan to do about a loss."}],[{"start":366.4,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1748302346_8909.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

生物计算机是如何“培育”的

澳大利亚初创公司Cortical Labs与英国的bit.bio共同打造了CL1,旨在创造“合成生物智能”。

工作中遇到问题?我的聊天机器人会给你发消息

大量由人工智能生成的投诉,意味着人力资源和客户服务部门将面临一种新的无端麻烦。

如何让孩子们重新开始阅读

如今,出于兴趣而阅读的年轻人比以往任何时候都少,这一趋势带来了广泛的经济和社会影响。我们能否扭转这一局面?

市值100亿美元的英国能源挑战者普拉克斯集团如何走向瓦解

林赛炼油厂所有者的倒闭是一个警示故事,说明一家缺乏足够财力来管理其庞大业务的公司所面临的风险。

与特朗普通话后俄罗斯对乌克兰发动创纪录空袭

美国停止交付关键拦截器后,克里姆林宫派出500多架伊朗设计的无人机。

印度证监会暂时禁止Jane Street交易证券

该监管机构指责这家总部位于纽约的交易公司实施了操纵衍生品市场的“险恶计划”。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×