An ever riskier world economy - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
专栏 全球经济

An ever riskier world economy

Trump’s tariff war brings with it unpredictability and a consequent loss of confidence
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":6.06,"text":"We are living in the early stages of a revolution — the attempted conversion of the American republic into an arbitrary dictatorship. Whether Donald Trump will succeed in this attempt is, as yet, unclear. But what he wants to do seems self-evident. His way of governing — lawless, unpredictable, anti-intellectual, nationalist — will have the greatest impact on the US itself. But it is, inevitably, having a huge impact on the rest of the world, too, given the hegemonic role of the US since the second world war. No other country or group of countries can — or wants — to take its place. This revolution threatens chaos."}],[{"start":55.64,"text":"It is far too early to know what the full consequences will be. But it is not too early to make informed guesses on some aspects, notably the unpredictability and consequent loss of confidence being created by Trump’s tariff war. This loss of confidence was the theme of a podcast I did recently with Paul Krugman. Without predictable policies, a market economy cannot function well. If the uncertainty comes from the hegemon, the world economy as a whole will not function well either."}],[{"start":91.66,"text":"In its latest Global Economic Prospects, the World Bank has analysed just this. Its conclusions are inevitably provisional, but the direction of travel must be correct. It starts from the assumption that the tariffs in place in late May will remain over its forecast horizon. This might be too optimistic or too pessimistic. Nobody, perhaps not even Trump, knows. “In this context”, it judges, “global growth is projected to slow markedly to 2.3 per cent in 2025 [0.4 percentage points below the January 2025 forecast]— the slowest pace since 2008, aside from two years of outright global recession in 2009 and 2020. Over 2026-27, a pick-up in domestic demand is expected to lift global growth to a still subdued 2.5 per cent — far below the pre-pandemic decadal average of 3.1 per cent.”"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":157.2,"text":"All this is bad enough. But risks seem overwhelmingly to the downside. Thus, the uncertainty created by Trump’s trade war could lead to far greater declines in trade and investment than projected. Certainly, it will be hard to trust in any supposed “deals” now announced. Again, lower growth will increase social, political and fiscal fragility, so raising perceptions of risk in markets. This might create a doom-loop, with higher costs of finance increasing risk and lowering growth. Weak borrowers, private and public, might be driven into default. Shocks from natural disasters or conflict would then be even more economically damaging."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":205.66,"text":"Upsides can be imagined. New trade deals might be reached, in which many might, courageously, trust. AI-fairy-dust might cause a surge in global productivity and investment. Also, everything might just calm down. A difficulty for this is that today’s Trump shock comes after almost two decades of shocks: global and Eurozone financial crises; pandemic; post-pandemic inflation; and Ukraine-Russia war. Animal spirits must have been impaired."}],[{"start":239.66,"text":"Alas, as Indermit Gill, World Bank chief economist, stresses in his foreword, “the poorest countries will suffer the most”. “By 2027, the per capita GDP of high-income economies will be roughly where it had been expected to be before the Covid-19 pandemic. But developing economies would be worse off, with per capita GDP levels 6 per cent lower.” With the exception of China, it might take two decades for these countries to recoup their losses of the 2020s."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":274.04,"text":"This is not just a result of recent shocks. Thus, “Growth in developing economies has been ratcheting downward for three decades in a row — from an average of 5.9 per cent in the 2000s, to 5.1 per cent in the 2010s to 3.7 per cent in the 2020s.” This tracks the declining growth of world trade, from an average of 5.1 per cent in the 2000s to 4.6 per cent in the 2010s to 2.6 per cent in the 2020s. Meanwhile, debt is piling up. In the long run, it will not help that Trump insists climate change is a myth, too."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":316.48,"text":"So, what is to be done? First, liberalise trade. While developing countries have liberalised substantially in recent years, most of them still have far higher tariffs than high-income economies. Targeted infant-industry promotion can work. But if a country has little international leverage, the best policy remains one of free trade, coupled with the best possible policies for attracting investment, improving human capital and preserving economic stability. In a bad environment, as now, this is even more important than in a benign one."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":353.78,"text":"The choices for bigger powers — China, the EU, Japan, India, the UK and others — are more complex. First, they, too, need to improve their own policies to the greatest possible extent. They also need to co-operate in trying to sustain global rules among themselves, not least on trade. Some powers need to recognise that global imbalances are indeed a significant issue, though they are not about trade policy but rather global macroeconomic imbalances."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":389.62,"text":"This is far from all. As the US retreats from its historic role, others are having greatness thrust upon them. Continued progress on addressing the challenges of climate change and economic development depends on these powers. A better way to resolve excessive debts is necessary, for example. That requires going against today’s trend towards ever greater suspicion of one another."}],[{"start":415.42,"text":"It is possible — even likely — that we are witnessing the withering away of a great effort to promote a more prosperous and co-operative world. Some people will say that such an ending would just signal healthy “realism”. But it would be a folly: we share one planet; and so our destinies are intertwined. Modern technology has made this inescapable. We are at a turning point: we must choose wisely."}],[{"start":448.82,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1749634747_4308.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

生物计算机是如何“培育”的

澳大利亚初创公司Cortical Labs与英国的bit.bio共同打造了CL1,旨在创造“合成生物智能”。

工作中遇到问题?我的聊天机器人会给你发消息

大量由人工智能生成的投诉,意味着人力资源和客户服务部门将面临一种新的无端麻烦。

如何让孩子们重新开始阅读

如今,出于兴趣而阅读的年轻人比以往任何时候都少,这一趋势带来了广泛的经济和社会影响。我们能否扭转这一局面?

市值100亿美元的英国能源挑战者普拉克斯集团如何走向瓦解

林赛炼油厂所有者的倒闭是一个警示故事,说明一家缺乏足够财力来管理其庞大业务的公司所面临的风险。

与特朗普通话后俄罗斯对乌克兰发动创纪录空袭

美国停止交付关键拦截器后,克里姆林宫派出500多架伊朗设计的无人机。

印度证监会暂时禁止Jane Street交易证券

该监管机构指责这家总部位于纽约的交易公司实施了操纵衍生品市场的“险恶计划”。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×