The new nuclear arms race - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

The new nuclear arms race

Amid loose talk of resuming weapons tests, cold war-era controls are unravelling
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.69,"text":"Donald Trump’s statement last week that the US would resume testing nuclear weapons “on an equal basis” with Russia and China wrongfooted his own officials as much as it did Beijing and Moscow. Restarting warhead tests would break a three-decade moratorium by the major nuclear powers. Coming after Russia’s Vladimir Putin bragged of two new weapons delivery systems, it bolstered concerns that the world is sliding into a new nuclear arms race — when much of the cold war-era arms control architecture has collapsed."}],[{"start":43.339999999999996,"text":"Trump’s comments appeared primarily a response to Putin’s claims to have tested two nuclear-powered delivery platforms: Burevestnik, a long-range cruise missile, and Poseidon, a torpedo said to be able to devastate coastal regions with a radioactive tidal wave. Russia’s president said both could evade existing defences, in a swipe at Trump’s plan to expand today’s US missile defence system into an elaborate “Golden Dome”."}],[{"start":74.03,"text":"Trump may have intended to signal the US would step up testing of delivery systems, not warheads. In a weekend TV interview, though, he appeared to confirm that he meant explosive nuclear testing. His energy secretary said the US would simply continue systems tests involving “non-nuclear explosions”."}],[{"start":97.72,"text":"Whatever the truth, a return to US warhead testing would be a highly retrograde step. It would provide cover to do likewise not just for Russia and China but other nuclear states keen to upgrade their weapons. That could encourage non-nuclear states to pursue their own."}],[{"start":119.87,"text":"It would also demolish one of the few remaining pillars of US-Russian arms control. Agreements limiting missile defence systems (intended to buttress mutual deterrence) and intermediate-range missiles are no longer in force. The New Start treaty, limiting deployed strategic warheads to 1,550 on each side, is due to expire next February. Putin has offered a conditional one-year extension; Washington has made positive noises but not formally responded."}],[{"start":153.25,"text":"The erosion of arms control, rush for new systems and loose talk on testing are all the more unsettling since Russia’s war on Ukraine has marked the return of nuclear blackmail. Putin has used it from the outset to deter Nato countries from intervening and supplying the most lethal weapons to Kyiv. Chillingly, US intelligence estimated at 50-50 the chance that Moscow would carry out a threat to use a nuclear weapon when Russian forces were losing ground in Ukraine in late 2022."}],[{"start":190.5,"text":"The decades-old strategic balance between the two nuclear superpowers threatens to be upset, meanwhile, by China’s rise as an atomic power. The Pentagon estimates Beijing’s armoury could swell from about 600 warheads to more than 1,000 by 2030. Trump has insisted China should join future arms control agreements; US officials worry that, in terms of deployed warheads allowed by New Start, Russia’s arsenal plus China’s could soon dwarf its own. Beijing has rejected joining talks, arguing it has far fewer weapons."}],[{"start":233.29,"text":"Despite its resistance to caps on its warheads, however, it is in China’s interest to take part in efforts to avert a senseless, multilateral, new arms race. Beijing is already understood to have privately urged restraint after Putin’s 2022 threats. Nuclear weapons are not only abhorrent for their fearsome power, but ruinously expensive."}],[{"start":259.99,"text":"Whatever Trump’s justifiable frustrations with Putin in his efforts to end the Ukraine war and regardless of China’s position today, the US president ought to engage with Moscow on extending New Start as a step towards rebuilding arms control. He has previously called that a priority. Making decisive progress towards it would be a far better way of earning the Nobel Peace Prize he craves than ending the long taboo on weapons testing."}],[{"start":300.58000000000004,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1762337692_8671.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美联储将如何应对伊朗战争的后续影响?

欧洲央行现在仍然处于“有利位置”吗?通胀预期会迫使英格兰银行出手吗?

“AI先生”彼得•蒂尔在罗马讨论“敌基督”

一系列闭门活动将挑战美国籍教宗利奥十四世的信念,而他此前曾警示人工智能的风险。

特朗普的“震撼与战争”使这场经济危机不同以往

与伊朗的冲突将比去年的关税危机留下更深、更持久的伤痕。

间谍与补贴:中国加入巴西200亿美元外卖应用之战

本地外卖平台iFood与中国背景的Keeta互相指责对方从事企业间谍活动和卑劣手段。

伊朗战争引发全球油价剧烈波动,散户争相押注原油

与原油价格挂钩的美国最大ETF在油市出现“迷因股”时刻之际录得有史以来最大资金流入。

“每天投出10到15份申请”:英国招聘低迷如何冲击年轻人

分析人士表示,部长们推动帮助近100万名未在教育、就业或培训中的人群的举措还需更进一步。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×