How the internet can rebuild trust - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

How the internet can rebuild trust

Algorithms and generative AI models that decide what billions of users see should be transparent
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

As AI companies fight for dominance, the temptation to embed bias — commercial, political or cultural — into training data will be immense
"}],[{"start":5.8,"text":"The writer is co-founder of Wikipedia and author of ‘The Seven Rules of Trust’"}],[{"start":11.29,"text":"When I founded Wikipedia in 2001, pioneers of the internet were excited by its promise to give the world access to truth and connection."}],[{"start":22.18,"text":"Two decades later, that optimism has curdled into cynicism. We scroll through feeds serving up news we no longer believe, interact with bots we cannot identify and brace for the next synthetic scandal created by fake images from artificial intelligence."}],[{"start":42.06,"text":"Before the web can move forward, it must remember how it earned trust in the first place."}],[{"start":48.49,"text":"The defining difference between web 1.0 and the platforms that dominate today is not technological sophistication but moral architecture. Early online communities were transparent about process and purpose. They exposed how information was created, corrected and shared. That visibility generated accountability. People could see how the system worked and participate in fixing its mistakes. Trust emerged not from perfection (there was still plenty of online trolling, flame wars and toxicity), but from openness."}],[{"start":84.49000000000001,"text":"Today’s digital landscape reverses that logic. Recommendation algorithms and generative AI models decide what billions of users see, yet their workings remain opaque. When platforms insist their systems are too complex to explain, users are asked to substitute faith for understanding."}],[{"start":105.78,"text":"AI intensifies the problem. Large language models can produce fluent paragraphs and convincing deepfakes. The tools that promised to democratise knowledge now threaten to make knowledge unrecognisable. If everything can be fabricated, the distinction between truth and illusion becomes a matter of persuasion."}],[{"start":127.36,"text":"Re-establishing trust in this environment requires more than fact-checking or content moderation. It requires structural transparency. Every platform that mediates information should make provenance visible: where data originated, how it was processed, and what uncertainty surrounds it. Think of it as nutritional labelling for information. Without it, citizens cannot make informed judgments and democracies cannot function."}],[{"start":156.64,"text":"Equally important is independence. As AI companies fight for dominance, the temptation to embed bias — commercial, political or cultural — into training data will be immense. Guardrails must ensure the entities curating public knowledge are accountable to the public, not just investors."}],[{"start":177.42999999999998,"text":"And we must revive civility too. Some of the best early online spaces relied on norms that valued reasoned argument over insult. They were imperfect but self-correcting because participants felt a duty to the collective project. Today’s social platforms monetise outrage. Restoring trust means designing systems that reward good-faith discourse — through visibility algorithms, community-based moderation, or friction that forces reflection before reposting."}],[{"start":212.55999999999997,"text":"Governments have a role to play but regulation alone cannot rebuild trust. It has to be observed in practice. Platforms should disclose not only how their algorithms work but also when they fail. AI developers should publish dataset sources and error rates."}],[{"start":232.7,"text":"The challenge of our time is not that information is scarce but that authenticity is. Important aspects of the early internet succeeded because people could trace what they read to another human being, even if the other human being was operating behind a pseudonym. The new internet must restore that chain of custody."}],[{"start":255.83999999999997,"text":"We are entering an era when machines can mimic any voice and invent any image. If we want truth to survive that onslaught, we must embed transparency, independence and empathy into the digital architecture itself. The early days of the web showed it could be done. The question is whether we still have the will to do it again."}],[{"start":284.46999999999997,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1764835851_6780.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

急聘:波兰卡车司机

欧洲卡车司机短缺可能推高货运成本,对已然受到贸易争端和战争干扰的供应链和各国经济来说是一个挑战。

AI行情回来了?

标普500指数走出持续近三个月的横盘,但涨幅中超过90%来自13只股票,而且全部属于大型科技股。

科技巨头押注语音为主要的AI交互方式

随着新一代AI智能体问世,OpenAI和谷歌大举投资语音系统,将其打造为主要交互方式。

“每一美元都可流动”:加州富豪抢购新西兰“黄金签证”

在相关规定放宽后,申请在新西兰无限期工作、居住和学习的人数有所增加。

AI时代,谁还需要顾问?

阿姆斯特朗:推动企业落实建议的变革是一场只有人类才能参与的“身体对抗赛”。

欧洲必须进一步落实其人工智能抱负

美国和中国将这项技术作为国家权力工具,而欧盟仍在考虑其发展方向。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×