AI poses a new antitrust problem - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

AI poses a new antitrust problem

Washington cheered on the consolidation of the social web in the 2010s — it must not make the same mistake today
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

By taking controlling stakes in AI companies, hyperscalers are ensuring that the industry evolves in a way that serves their infrastructure
"}],[{"start":6.69,"text":"The writer is former associate director for litigation in the FTC’s Bureau of Competition and co-founder of Simonsen Sussman"}],[{"start":15.830000000000002,"text":"I joined the Federal Trade Commission in the summer of 2021, just weeks after a federal judge dismissed the agency’s antitrust complaint against Facebook. It was a frantic, all-hands-on-deck moment. I was thrown into a room with lawyers and economists and tasked with keeping the case alive."}],[{"start":36.91,"text":"We rewrote the complaint, which challenged Facebook’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014 respectively. Even then we were well aware of how late it was. If the FTC eventually won at trial (which, spoiler, it did not), the appeals process and complexity of unwinding these companies meant that a remedy might not arrive until 2029 — 17 years after the first acquisition."}],[{"start":67.21,"text":"Last month, Judge James Boasberg ruled that Meta was not a monopoly. The decision highlighted the difficulty that regulators around the world have in challenging acquisitions long after their completion."}],[{"start":81.6,"text":"Yet when Facebook made these purchases, regulators offered little pushback. This reflected a broader pathology at the time. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the American economy seemed precarious. Against that backdrop, Silicon Valley offered a glimmer of hope. Companies like Facebook and Google were viewed as national champions. CEOs were paraded through the White House, treated as dignitaries of a new economic order."}],[{"start":113,"text":"We are now watching history repeat itself. Just as the government cheered on the consolidation of the social web in the 2010s, Washington is offering similar support today for the “hyperscalers” — Microsoft, Amazon and Google — to position themselves as guardians of artificial intelligence. Despite tough rhetoric, the administration is not pushing back on AI deals. We saw this recently when the Department of Justice cleared Google’s acquisition of cloud security company Wiz, waving through further consolidation in the cloud security market. Similarly, the regulatory response to the $38bn cloud deal between Amazon and OpenAI — an arrangement that binds the most prominent AI start-up to a dominant cloud incumbent — has been muted."}],[{"start":166.03,"text":"Such deals are fraught with conflict of interest. By taking controlling stakes in AI companies, hyperscalers are ensuring that the industry evolves in a way that serves their infrastructure and increases the moats around their lines of business. They have every incentive to direct innovation towards massive, data-hungry, compute-inefficient models rather than efficient, decentralised systems."}],[{"start":192.73,"text":"Yet instead of scrutiny, we are seeing a pilgrimage of AI CEOs to the White House. Proposals for a moratorium on state AI laws have been made. This is the language of antitrust amnesty. It suggests that, once again, economic uncertainty is leading Washington to trade competition for the pursuit of international corporate leadership."}],[{"start":216.26999999999998,"text":"The contrast between the current administration and the previous one is stark. When Nvidia attempted to acquire Arm in 2020 — a deal that would have locked down the fundamental architecture of chips used for AI — the FTC sued to block it and the deal was abandoned. Because Arm remained independent, Google is now able to compete with Nvidia in the production of AI chips, using Arm’s technology to build its own processors.  "}],[{"start":247.74999999999997,"text":"Regulators waited too long to address the danger that Facebook’s acquisitions posed to competition. This should be a wake-up call for the AI era. If we allow hyperscalers to devour the AI ecosystem under the guise of national competition, we will be left with a tech sector that is more centralised and more extractive than the one we have today. By the time it is a problem, it may once again be too late to change."}],[{"start":283.82,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1765248116_1543.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

急聘:波兰卡车司机

欧洲卡车司机短缺可能推高货运成本,对已然受到贸易争端和战争干扰的供应链和各国经济来说是一个挑战。

AI行情回来了?

标普500指数走出持续近三个月的横盘,但涨幅中超过90%来自13只股票,而且全部属于大型科技股。

科技巨头押注语音为主要的AI交互方式

随着新一代AI智能体问世,OpenAI和谷歌大举投资语音系统,将其打造为主要交互方式。

“每一美元都可流动”:加州富豪抢购新西兰“黄金签证”

在相关规定放宽后,申请在新西兰无限期工作、居住和学习的人数有所增加。

AI时代,谁还需要顾问?

阿姆斯特朗:推动企业落实建议的变革是一场只有人类才能参与的“身体对抗赛”。

欧洲必须进一步落实其人工智能抱负

美国和中国将这项技术作为国家权力工具,而欧盟仍在考虑其发展方向。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×