Reading the runes on a Warsh Fed - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
专栏 凯文•沃什

Reading the runes on a Warsh Fed

The presumptive next chair might be better than others on the list, but he is a confusing, perhaps confused, figure
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.19,"text":"If confirmed as chair of the Federal Reserve, is Kevin Warsh going to be an inflation hawk or Donald Trump’s poodle? His repeated statements on monetary policy and the broader obligations of the Fed suggest the former. But his more recent statements on the inflation outlook and the fact that Trump chose him very much suggest the latter. More broadly, is he a man of conviction and judgment or is he a weathervane, blowing with the wind from the Republican side of politics and so in favour of loose monetary policy when Republicans are in power and of tight money when the Democrats are?"}],[{"start":47.54,"text":"Warsh’s words indicate that he is very much the “hard money” central banker. Notably, in a speech to the Shadow Open Market Committee in New York given in March 2010, when the US economy was, remember, still struggling with the deeply recessionary aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, he had already started worrying about Fed credibility."}],[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":71.62,"text":"He made four main points. First, Fed independence applies only to monetary policy, not “regulatory policy, consumer protection or other responsibilities granted to the Federal Reserve”. Second, the “Fed, as first-responder, must strongly resist the temptation to be the ultimate rescuer”. Third, “governments may be tempted to influence the central bank to keep monetary policy looser longer to finance the debt and stimulate activity”. But the “only popularity central bankers should seek, if at all, is in the history books”. Last, “central banks, here and abroad, have worked for decades to get inflation down to levels consistent with price stability. We should not risk these hard-won gains.”"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":118.95,"text":"Intellectually, at least, today’s Warsh appears the same as the one of 2010. In his IMF lecture delivered in April 2025, he stressed not only the Fed’s “institutional drift”, but also its recent “failure to satisfy an essential part of its statutory remit, price stability. It has also contributed to an explosion of federal spending. And the Fed’s outsized role and underperformance have weakened the important and worthy case for monetary policy independence.” He made other criticisms, the most pointed being that “the Fed has been the most important buyer of US Treasury debt — and other liabilities backed by the US government — since 2008”. He asserts: “Fiscal dominance — where the nation’s debts constrain monetary policymakers — was long thought by economists to be a possible end-state. My view is that monetary dominance — where the central bank becomes the ultimate arbiter of fiscal policy — is the clearer and more present danger.” For Warsh, then, easy money is the road to ruin."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":187.13,"text":"So what has persuaded Trump, who is fiscal dominance incarnate, and has been berating poor Jay Powell as a “jerk” for not cutting interest rates faster, to appoint Warsh chair, apart maybe from his good looks? One reason might be that he likes Warsh’s hostility to the Fed’s “woke” over-reach. Another might be that he likes his inclination towards financial deregulation. Yet another might be that he is a relatively orthodox choice, whose appointment should calm nervous markets (as it has, so far). But a crucial point must be that Warsh has conveniently concluded that inflation is no longer a threat, because of technology-fuelled productivity growth. That might even be right. As Warsh notes, Alan Greenspan made a similar bet about the impact of the internet in the 1990s. But it is a bold leap for a man who feared inflation back in 2010, in the midst of a deep slump. If he got his way, he would be replacing the “data-dependency” of the Fed with a hunch. Given the huge US fiscal deficits and debts and the US economy’s fast growth, that would be a big gamble."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Column chart of US government balance as a % of GDP showing US federal deficits are still very high as a share of GDP
"}],[{"start":256.66999999999996,"text":"How then might the choice of Warsh play out? I actually agree with some of Warsh’s criticisms of the Fed, notably over its drift into areas that are not part of its core functions. I agree, too, that the post-pandemic inflation was in part its fault: together with other central banks, it failed even to consider that the jump in the money supply in 2020 might lead to a jump in the price level. I also agree with Warsh that the backward-looking monetary policy framework introduced in 2020 was a conceptual and practical error (not to mention grossly mistimed)."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Line chart of Federal Reserve assets, as % of GDP showing The Fed’s balance sheet has already fallen a long way from its peak
"}],[{"start":296.4,"text":"It is comforting, too, to note that the Fed is an institution. The Fed is far more than the chair. Its leadership matters hugely. But Warsh would be unable to ride roughshod over other members of the Federal Open Market Committee or even its staff, at least in the short run."}],[{"start":316.83,"text":"Yet worries remain, on two fronts. The first is that Warsh might be far too willing to argue for whatever Trump wants, even though this would mean accepting fiscal dominance, in spades. It also appears that he intends to justify doing so by offsetting lower short-term rates with higher longer-term ones, as the Fed’s balance sheet is aggressively shrunk. At the same time, the US Treasury is likely to shift further towards short-term financing. With a more strongly upward-sloping US yield curve, the likely outcome would be greater demand for dollar financing at the short end, and less demand at the long end. Above all, given the decline in banks’ reserves and financial deregulation as well, the balance sheets of the financial sector would become more fragile. The incentive to hold the dollar might also fall, as short rates decline and fear of inflation jumps. The result might be another financial crisis."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Column chart of Federal debt as % of GDP, by holder showing US federal debt is back to 1946 levels relative to GDP
"}],[{"start":372.72999999999996,"text":"Yes, Warsh is a better candidate than many of the others on the list. But he is a confusing, perhaps confused, figure. The US and the world need a Fed chair who will stand up to Trump. To his credit, Powell has proved himself to be such a man. Will Warsh?"}],[{"start":401.12999999999994,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1770366503_4639.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

2026年奥斯卡提名一览:罪人获创纪录16项提名

《一战再战》在猛烈冲刺中收获13项提名,助华纳兄弟娱乐公司拿下总计30项提名。

在地缘经济战中,哪些咽喉要道是必争之地?

这取决于它对目标造成的破坏程度、可能引发的反噬,以及其耐用性。

PC涨价与台湾的考验

“芯片产能短缺、芯片基板短缺,甚至连用于芯片测试的探针卡也短缺。”

为何特朗普任由伊朗的核库存完好无损?

两周军事行动后,美国政府似乎仍无回收已富集铀的计划。

一周图表:油价上涨只是短期忧虑

长期通胀预期保持稳定。

为何近年来最佳的奥斯卡也可能是最后的“回光返照”

今年可谓众口皆宜,但迫在眉睫的华纳兄弟—派拉蒙交易正威胁整个好莱坞生态。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×