AI should not drive today’s interest rate decisions - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
货币政策

AI should not drive today’s interest rate decisions

How the technology will affect prices is still uncertain
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.05,"text":"AI promises to boost productivity, but its impact on inflation remains a bit of a black box. That has not stopped tech optimists — across Silicon Valley and Wall Street — from calling on the US Federal Reserve to already incorporate AI’s cost-cutting potential into its monetary policy. The head of Northern Trust’s asset management unit told the FT this week that the technology will be “massively disinflationary” and that the central bank should “hold steady” on rate decisions. Kevin Warsh, Donald Trump’s nomination to be the Fed’s next chair, has also argued that AI can ease price pressures, enabling the rate cuts that the president desperately wants. "}],[{"start":48.9,"text":"In theory, they have a point. AI can automate administrative tasks, produce content in seconds and analyse company data. This can boost the productivity of existing workers, raise supply, and push down the price of products and services — and it can enable businesses to save on labour costs. Changes to the Fed’s rate policy filter through to households and businesses with a long lag. So, it makes sense for central bankers to at least consider the forthcoming impact of large language models on economy-wide efficiency gains and prices. "}],[{"start":82.69999999999999,"text":"But in practice, making actual monetary policy adjustments today based on the promise of AI is a shot in the dark. For a start, LLMs are still evolving and use of the technology in business is not yet widespread. Fewer than one-fifth of US companies had adopted it by the end of 2025, according to the Census Bureau data. It will take further time for boardrooms to optimise its usage in their organisations. Though some companies have cited automation as the reason for redundancies, a recent global study found over 80 per cent of senior executives reported no impact of AI on their company’s employment or productivity so far. "}],[{"start":123.14999999999999,"text":"Over time the efficiency gains are expected to become clearer across industries. But their impact on prices will depend on how fast adoption takes place, and what share of the efficiencies are passed on to consumers. Assuming there is a productivity boost that raises incomes, and that many of those made redundant by the technology find roles in new sectors and occupations — as happened with past inventions — then demand and price pressures could rise in the long run. As research by the Bank for International Settlements concludes, the overall impact of AI on inflation depends on the relative size of these potential boosts to supply and demand. "}],[{"start":164.29999999999998,"text":"In the interim, the infrastructure and cyber security investments needed to support the adoption of AI will provide an uplift to inflation. Capital expenditure on data centres — which among the so-called hyperscalers is projected to reach around $700bn this year — and highly valued tech stock prices are supporting US demand. The power requirements for training models and inference may put pressure on energy prices too."}],[{"start":190.14999999999998,"text":"Even if AI does in time prove to be deflationary, there are other inflationary dynamics central bankers need to weigh. Will ongoing geopolitical ructions make supply shocks a norm? Will spending on ageing populations and defence raise demand? What all this means for the “neutral interest rate” — at which monetary policy is neither expansionary nor contractionary — is anyone’s guess. All else being equal, a tech-led growth boom could in fact raise this rate. "}],[{"start":217.34999999999997,"text":"Central bankers should be closely monitoring how AI is being adopted and how it is affecting productivity, as Warsh admitted in his hearing with the US Senate Banking committee on Tuesday. Policymakers are also sensibly embracing the technology to support internal analysis. Still, while LLMs are set to be transformative, their overall impact on prices remains far too uncertain to confidently shape interest rate decisions today."}],[{"start":247.84999999999997,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1776922697_2845.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

大型科技公司为何在英国煽动动荡?

埃隆•马斯克在贝尔法斯特、南安普顿及更广泛地区放大反移民情绪的做法,不能仅用意识形态来解释。

乌克兰和平窗口不会永远敞开

目前有机会让这场冲突“冻结”,但普京对“完全胜利”的幻想可能会成为障碍。

拉丁美洲的世界杯球衣如何沦为政治工具

极右翼民粹主义者已经把自家阵营的队服当成标志性符号,而左翼正试图夺回这块阵地。

欧洲股票具备美国同行无法匹敌的“和平红利”

如果伊朗冲突引发的能源短缺缓解,欧洲公司在复苏方面将获益更多。

哈利•波特毁了英国

我们最宝贵的资产已经被魔法部挪用。

为什么我们彼此不再交流?

与聊天机器人对话永远无法带来同样的人类滋养。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×