There was nothing here to save Starmer - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 英国政治

There was nothing here to save Starmer

Voters need hope, but so do his MPs — and he did not give them any
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.95,"text":"There are precious few speeches in political history that fundamentally alter the landscape. Sir Keir Starmer’s on Monday morning will not be one of them."}],[{"start":14.05,"text":"It wasn’t a bad speech, though Starmer might have made it at any time in the past few years. But it was not one that changed the argument over whether he should be ousted as prime minister. Those who are demanding a “change of direction” or hoping for a glimpse of a different leader will not have found it. "}],[{"start":30.35,"text":"He tried. There would be a change of pace, a redoubling of commitments, Labour would go further, it would go faster. It would speak for the needs of the people who rely on it. There were even a couple of nuggets to cheer his MPs, not least the commitment to renationalising what remains of British Steel. On Europe, Starmer promised much more effort to put the UK back in Europe’s heart but stopped short of rejoining the institutions that would actually do that. "}],[{"start":58.150000000000006,"text":"So those looking for some real red meat will not have found it. Voters need hope, he declared, but so do his MPs and he did not give them any. The best reason for Starmer to stay — that the country simply does not need this now — is not being heard by MPs whose current focus is on the party. "}],[{"start":78.80000000000001,"text":"He was right in one way, when he argued that Labour cannot win as a weaker version of Reform UK or the Greens but only as a stronger version of Labour. Yet the fundamental problem for Labour and Starmer is that voters are not listening to him and therefore it. In many of the areas lost to Reform last week, there is a serious danger that voters have now lost the habit of voting Labour. "}],[{"start":101.55000000000001,"text":"Those who might yet be open to returning to the fold will need permission to give Labour another glance. A change of leader would offer that permission, though it might prove a fleeting respite given that nothing will change the economic fundamentals of the UK and some contenders alarm the bond markets. “Things Can Only Get Better” was a campaign song, not a forecast. "}],[{"start":123.30000000000001,"text":"And yet what is also clear is that many, many Labour MPs are nervous about stepping over the edge into a leadership challenge. They are not sure who will win. Those who want to see Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, in the role need to give him time to find a path back into parliament. So what might delay Starmer’s departure is that raft of MPs who are sure he has to go but not convinced it has to be this week. "}],[{"start":149.35000000000002,"text":"What won’t save him is this speech, or his comment at the weekend that he wants to go on for 10 years, or the decision to bring back Gordon Brown or Harriet Harman as advisers. Those moves probably made things worse, showing the paucity of strategy. "}],[{"start":165.65000000000003,"text":"The one note of substance was the clear indication that Starmer has no intention of making it easy for his opponents. He will not lightly step aside. That could buy him more time, or it could force one of his would-be successors into action. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has the least to gain from waiting. "}],[{"start":183.95000000000005,"text":"There are good reasons for Labour not to act now. There is no real hurry. The next election is up to three years away. None of the mooted alternatives has offered reason to think they have a serious plan for the country and most are likely to move in a direction of higher taxes, more regulation and more state interference. "}],[{"start":201.05000000000004,"text":"But events may simply have moved too far. What Starmer’s speech showed is that there is probably nothing he can do to save himself beyond refusing to crumble. His best bet now is that he has shown more grit than those who want him out."}],[{"start":215.85000000000005,"text":"The basic calculations still hold. Starmer’s tenure is ebbing away. Britain is heading into another zombie premiership. The blow could fall today, tomorrow, next week or next month. MPs are just weighing the odds and timings they need to get their people in place. The decision is made. It is now only about logistics. "}],[{"start":241.15000000000006,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1778549220_6951.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

现代战争的血腥一如往昔

科技的进步并没有减少俄乌战争中的伤亡,武装无人机和AI正把前线变成险恶的杀戮地带,惨烈程度堪比一战。

帕拉贝利斯医药公司于与再生元达成交易次日披露IPO计划,上市热潮升温

成立已有十年且资金雄厚、从格雷格•维尔丁在哈佛实验室孵化出的“不可成药”生物技术公司——帕拉贝利斯医药公司,正寻求成为今年第12家进行首次公开募股的药物研发企业
20小时前

英伟达部署900亿美元助推AI繁荣

黄仁勋正成为依赖其芯片的AI相关公司的最大资助者之一。这些支出涉及逾145家公司,从AI模型开发商、云服务提供商到基础设施供应商不一而足。

Lex专栏:股市投资者信心爆棚,但现金见底

鉴于标普500指数高度依赖以人工智能为驱动的公司,股市出现小问题和大问题的可能性都很大。

FT社评:埃博拉疫情暴露全球应对大流行病准备不足

援助资金减少以及特朗普政府对全球公共卫生理念的敌意,正危及我们所有人。

“四大”急聘AI专业人才,岗位数量盖过传统审计师

全球最大的几家会计师事务所正竞相适应颠覆性的技术变革。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×