Britain’s defence investment predicament - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT观点

Britain’s defence investment predicament

After months of wrangling, Starmer’s military funding plan still came up short
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.62,"text":"Britain’s long-delayed defence investment plan is one of the last big announcements from outgoing prime minister Sir Keir Starmer. It exemplifies the inability of his cabinet to face up adequately to the hard choices of government. The plan has been spruced up since the resignation earlier this month of defence secretary John Healey (which helped seal Starmer’s fate); the extra spending over the next four years is upped by £1.5bn to £15bn. Yet Healey’s criticism holds true: the long-delayed plan remains well short of what was required. The presumptive next prime minister, Andy Burnham, will somehow need to find more money."}],[{"start":43.32,"text":"The shape of the plan shows lessons have been learned from how the Ukraine and Iran conflicts have reshaped war. Some £5bn will be invested into a “drone transformation” to deliver uncrewed and autonomous weapons for all services. Rather than ageing destroyers and frigates being replaced, the navy will procure six “hybrid” vessels designed as mother ships for uncrewed systems."}],[{"start":65.64,"text":"A necessary balance is struck with continuing to fund the broader spectrum of capabilities, including high-end projects such as the Aukus submarine project. But military experts warn of an excessive focus on long-term programmes designed to counter Chinese capabilities and project power into the Asia-Pacific, rather than preparing to fight — or preferably deter — a conflict with Russia, which Nato has warned could happen by 2030."}],[{"start":90.84,"text":"Starmer rightly insisted that ensuring the investment is effective will require a revamp of shambolic procurement procedures that have resulted in defence spending being seen as a “bottomless pit”. Too much money has been wasted on mishandled projects such as the £6.3bn Ajax armoured vehicle programme. The investment in drones will also require setting up a new ecosystem of technological development and manufacturing capacity."}],[{"start":115.8,"text":"The prime minister claimed to have made hard choices by sacrificing some road and energy investments to boost the defence package. Yet his plan still falls far below the additional £28bn that defence officials warned was needed to fully fund all 62 recommendations of last year’s Strategic Defence Review, which the government accepted."}],[{"start":135.56,"text":"The year-long hiatus between the review and the investment plan intended to fund it also created a vacuum of uncertainty that has put a heavy strain on the UK defence industrial base, especially the agile start-ups needed to deliver innovative technologies. Neither the speed of action nor the amount of investment has matched the urgency of the rhetoric."}],[{"start":154.76,"text":"UK defence spending is now projected to reach 2.7 per cent of GDP by 2029-30. But hitting 3 per cent is only a “priority” for the next multiyear spending plan and the commitment to hit the 3.5 per cent Nato target by 2035 is vague. That trajectory will turn Britain, long a Nato frontrunner on defence spending as a proportion of GDP, into a mid-tier country behind Poland, Germany, and the Baltic and Nordic nations. All are closer to Russia than Britain, but the UK has no less a responsibility to protect its citizens and prepare for a conflict that would drag in all Nato members. If Britain is to continue to provide the diplomatic leadership that has been one of Starmer’s strengths on issues such as Ukraine, moreover, it will have to show it is ready to contribute its share towards Europe’s defence."}],[{"start":205.84,"text":"Starmer suggested Burnham could use the defence plan as a “platform” to find more funding, but warned that the idea of “defence bonds”, circulating in Whitehall, was still a form of borrowing that could push up interest rates. In reality, the new premier will have to make savings, for example, from the soaring welfare budget. Whether he can succeed here, where the outgoing UK leader has failed, will be a defining test of the Burnham premiership."}],[{"start":230.76,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1782879268_4521.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

欧洲风机制造商探讨合并,抗衡中国对手

欧盟更新并购审查指南之际,中国竞争压力或将推动行业并购。

特朗普压低油价的能力受到考验

黑格:随着伊朗冲突一拖再拖,口头干预或已不足以抑制油价。

朝韩竞相建造核动力潜艇

去年获得唐纳德•特朗普首肯后,韩国看到了发展更强大潜艇的机会。

电子价签之争凸显美国经济焦虑

新泽西州成为首个叫停电子价签的州,原因是担心这些价签会将动态定价机制引入杂货店,甚至监视顾客。

一周展望:美联储会加息吗?

投资者本周还将密切关注英国央行可能如何应对通胀再度抬头的迹象。

使用Kimi K3等中国开源AI模型有何风险?

萨克斯:真正的问题不在于海外开源,而在于缺乏保护基础设施的协调机制来应对网络攻击。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×