US rebukes Europeans over ‘sea of red’ military gaps - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
北约

US rebukes Europeans over ‘sea of red’ military gaps

‘We hope to see more from countries like the United Kingdom,’ says Pentagon policy chief
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":0,"text":"The US has rebuked European allies whose military capability gaps have been described as “a sea of red” in Nato’s colour-coded assessments, as the Trump administration weighs how quickly to withdraw American weapons and troops from the continent."}],[{"start":21.48,"text":"Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s policy chief, met Nato ambassadors in Brussels on Thursday to discuss European defence investments in the context of a review of US military deployments in Europe due to conclude in December. He told some European allies to move faster on buying critical conventional weapons systems that the US has long provided."}],[{"start":41.972,"text":"The US needed to see “major efforts to step up” from European allies and create “a Nato force model that’s going to put Europe in a lasting position where it’s going to be able to lead its own defence”, Colby told reporters after the meeting."}],[{"start":54.52,"text":"“We hope to see more from countries like the United Kingdom,” he said, while praising Germany, Poland and the Netherlands for their efforts to increase spending."}],[{"start":62.96,"text":"One Nato diplomat briefed on the discussions said Nato’s national assessments — which mark specific required capabilities as green, amber or red, with red regarded as insufficient — were “not pretty . . . there is a sea of red”. Two others confirmed the talks covered capability shortfalls and demands on many allies to spend more."}],[{"start":82.28,"text":"European capitals remain uncertain about how the Pentagon review will be carried out. But officials fear Washington could use the findings to punish countries that do not deliver a clear surge in spending and capabilities when deciding what US weapons and troops to pull from Europe."}],[{"start":97.34,"text":"Some European allies pushed back in Thursday’s closed-door meeting by pointing to areas where they meet or exceed Nato capability targets, according to the three people familiar with the discussions."}],[{"start":107.88,"text":"The targets assess what countries are expected to contribute to an alliance response in a conflict."}],[{"start":113.36,"text":"Colby also raised a written questionnaire Washington had sent to Nato ambassadors."}],[{"start":118.6,"text":"It asked whether their governments had restricted US use of military bases, whether they were buying weapons from American companies, and whether they had been “publicly supportive” of President Donald Trump’s foreign policy."}],[{"start":130.6,"text":"“We wanted to hear from allies directly, in writing,” Colby added."}],[{"start":135.68,"text":"Trump has long criticised Nato allies for relying on US protection while failing to spend enough on their own defence. Colby’s boss, defence secretary Pete Hegseth, in June announced a six-month review of US forces in Europe aimed at ending what he described as “freeriding” by some Nato allies."}],[{"start":151.92,"text":"Trump has forced Nato leaders to agree to increase their defence spending baseline to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035, with 3.5 per cent spent on “core” elements such as weapons and troops. Five of the alliance’s 32 members are expected to meet the 3.5 per cent requirement this year, according to Nato calculations."}],[{"start":172.08,"text":"Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, speaking alongside Colby ahead of the talks with alliance ambassadors, said that the process was important to ensure “a more honest and more equitable sharing” within the alliance — an initiative that Hegseth and Colby have dubbed “Nato 3.0”."}],[{"start":187.44,"text":"There is “still much more to be done,” said Rutte. “We will get there.”"}],[{"start":192.68,"text":"Colby repeated the Trump administration’s position that the US “remained committed to Nato”, but said that Washington needed to “look at the strategic posture at a high level of the US forces in Europe” in order to instead “prioritise the western hemisphere and the first island chain” in east Asia."}],[{"start":212.9,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1787884974_2546.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×