A Republican midterm defeat will not be an earthquake - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 美国政治

A Republican midterm defeat will not be an earthquake

Democrats are likely to make gains in Congress but divided government is unlikely to derail Trump’s agenda
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.64,"text":"America is at a point in its political cycle where phrases like “groundswell” and “wheels coming off” engulf us in historic waves. Who among us does not relish an electoral sea change? Noticeable by its absence, however, is any consensus on what the looming Republican defeat will mean. The answer is less than implied. Today’s circumstances are very different from those around typical midterm elections, including Donald Trump’s first term. Our vocabulary has not kept pace."}],[{"start":35.08,"text":"Loss of control of Congress — the switch to divided government — used to mean that the president’s room for manoeuvre would be roughly halved. Bill Clinton after 1994, George W Bush after 2006 and Barack Obama after 2010 all tried to meet the other party somewhere in the middle. The exception was Trump in 2018 who said “my name wasn’t on the ballot”. He made no effort to accommodate Democrats. It took two not to tango. The age of “lawfare” against Trump started then."}],[{"start":64.12,"text":"It is only a slight exaggeration to say that since Republican lawmakers do not have control of Congress, they cannot really lose it. Though Trump treats Congress like a Duma, sufficient handfuls of Republicans have joined Democrats to block some of his wishes. Foremost of these is a bill to impose draconian ID requirements on voters."}],[{"start":82.76,"text":"For the most part, however, Congress has been irrelevant in the last 20 months. King Charles III’s address to it earlier this year was a reflection in mutual augustness — the dignified bit of Britain’s constitution talking to the dignified bit of America’s."}],[{"start":96.8,"text":"Even if one accepts the extreme hypothesis that Democrats can speak with one voice, it is unclear what they can do to stop Trump from carrying on, still less make his wheels fly off. But that is what many are vowing. Democrats will be stymied by the fact that Trump’s most dramatic actions — his economic and military wars of choice — tend to bypass Capitol Hill. Any law that tries to block him can also be vetoed by him. Imagining that two-thirds of the Senate would convict Trump following impeachment would be as quixotic as the last two times."}],[{"start":128.1,"text":"That leaves politics. Democrats are wise not to have promised a wish list of things that are unlikely to become law. But they will get a fresh hearing from the American public."}],[{"start":137.88,"text":"Public opinion has turned strongly and perhaps decisively against Trump. His negative approval rating — the gap between those who approve of his record and those who don’t — is twice as bad today as it was on the eve of his party’s 2018 drubbing. It is also worse than for any other president barring Richard Nixon when he was drowning in Watergate. Trump’s base is also shrinking. Barely one in five Americans “strongly approve” of him (in some polls as little as one in seven)."}],[{"start":165.68,"text":"Does Trump care? The clearest sign that he does not comes from his biggest election promise — a $5,000 dividend to every adult American. This cash payout would only be triggered by a Republican midterm victory. Elections are supposedly about voters judging their representatives. Trump’s way is to offer voters a performance bonus."}],[{"start":186.04,"text":"His approach to Operation Epic Fury is also counterintuitive. Trump insists that Iran will only come to the table after November 3. Most other presidents would be scrambling to end the war before the nation goes to the polls. To be fair to Trump, he will probably not be in a much stronger position to negotiate an armistice after the election than he is today."}],[{"start":207.32,"text":"A better hunch is that he does not wish to reveal the type of concessions he would need to make to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Strategic defeats do not rally the base."}],[{"start":217.32,"text":"What, then, does Trump care about? Apart from his ensemble of monuments, he wants to protect himself, his family and his money from the law, and doubtless make even more of the latter. Absolute loyalty is key to both. Peter Thiel, his longest-running Silicon Valley backer, last week said that Trump was served by “not very smart but very loyal people”. Most will survive congressional scrutiny. Others can bid for a pardon."}],[{"start":240.28,"text":"That Trump’s much-vaunted 2024 realignment is already unscrambling is an alarm bell for elected Republicans. Young and non-white voters are leaving in droves. This suggests that the most intriguing politics will come from inside Trump’s administration, not the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. Trump and those in his orbit will want to carry on as if nothing has changed. Those wanting to succeed him, such as JD Vance and Marco Rubio, will face an impossible choice: Trump or their own ambitions?"}],[{"start":273.52,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1790735622_7468.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×