Donald Trump’s Iran war has cost $25bn, Pentagon says - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

Donald Trump’s Iran war has cost $25bn, Pentagon says

Use of costly missiles and air defence interceptors raises alarm about US readiness for other conflicts
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":7.4,"text":"Donald Trump’s Iran war has cost the US $25bn, driven primarily by the military’s use of munitions, according to the Pentagon."}],[{"start":17.3,"text":"Jay Hurst, the Pentagon’s comptroller, on Wednesday told Congress the US has spent “about $25bn on Operation Epic Fury”, in the defence department’s first public estimate of the conflict’s cost. “Most of that is ammunition,” he added."}],[{"start":32.8,"text":"The military has burned through years’ worth of costly missiles and air defence interceptors in its conflict against the Islamic republic, raising alarm about the US’s readiness for a potential conflict with China or Russia. The White House has denied the war has caused a munitions shortage."}],[{"start":49.65,"text":"But the US use of Tomahawk missiles and Patriot and Thaad interceptors in attacks on Iran have eaten into stockpiles and outpaced their annual production rates."}],[{"start":59.55,"text":"Defence secretary Pete Hegseth, whose testimony marked his first public appearance before Congress since the start of the Iran war, did not answer a question about how much more the conflict would cost, saying: “What is it worth to ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon, considering the radical ambitions of that regime?” "}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Status of key US munitions
MunitionUnit costPre-war inventory (estimated)Use in war (estimated)Delivery time (months)
Tomahawk$2.6mn3,1001,000+47
JASSM$2.6mn4,4001,100+48
PrSM$1.6mn9040-7046
SM-3$28.7mn410130-25064
SM-6$5.3mn1,160190-37053
Thaad$15.5mn360190-29053
Patriot$3.9mn2,3301,060-1,43042
Source: Center for Strategic & International Studies. April 21 2026
"}],[{"start":80.69999999999999,"text":"He also declined to say how much longer the conflict would go on."}],[{"start":84.69999999999999,"text":"While the American bombing campaign has ceased amid a fragile ceasefire between Washington and Tehran, the US military’s effort to exert economic pressure on the regime with a naval blockade involves more than a dozen warships and 100 aircraft."}],[{"start":99.85,"text":"Since the truce was agreed, the US has sent more warships and thousands of additional troops to the Middle East, including a third aircraft carrier, the first time the American navy has had three such vessels in the region in more than 20 years."}],[{"start":115.25,"text":"Hurst, who testified alongside Hegseth and General Dan Caine, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, about the Pentagon’s record $1.5tn budget request, said Congress would receive a request for more funding via the White House “once we have a full assessment of the cost of the conflict”. "}],[{"start":131.55,"text":"The Pentagon had initially asked the White House to submit a $200bn supplemental request, though Hegseth has previously said that number could change. "}],[{"start":140,"text":"Pentagon officials have said the $1.5tn request does not incorporate the costs of the Iran war."}],[{"start":146.7,"text":"Equipment losses and maintenance are also a factor in the Pentagon’s $25bn price tag, Hurst added. A range of American military assets have sustained damage or been lost, including fighter, attack and transport aircraft, drones and radars in Iranian attacks and friendly fire incidents. "}],[{"start":165.29999999999998,"text":"During his testimony, Hegseth had several combative exchanges with Democrats on the House armed services committee who criticised the administration’s approach to the conflict. "}],[{"start":175.45,"text":"In one testy exchange, Hegseth said calling the Iran war a “quagmire” is “handing propaganda to our enemies”. "}],[{"start":183,"text":"“Shame on you for that statement, and statements like that are reckless to our troops,” he said. "}],[{"start":188.3,"text":"“Don’t say: ‘I support the troops on one hand, and then a two-month mission is a quagmire’,” Hegseth added. “Who you cheering for here? Who you pulling for?”"}],[{"start":205.05,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1777512078_9722.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

大型科技公司为何在英国煽动动荡?

埃隆•马斯克在贝尔法斯特、南安普顿及更广泛地区放大反移民情绪的做法,不能仅用意识形态来解释。

乌克兰和平窗口不会永远敞开

目前有机会让这场冲突“冻结”,但普京对“完全胜利”的幻想可能会成为障碍。

拉丁美洲的世界杯球衣如何沦为政治工具

极右翼民粹主义者已经把自家阵营的队服当成标志性符号,而左翼正试图夺回这块阵地。

欧洲股票具备美国同行无法匹敌的“和平红利”

如果伊朗冲突引发的能源短缺缓解,欧洲公司在复苏方面将获益更多。

哈利•波特毁了英国

我们最宝贵的资产已经被魔法部挪用。

为什么我们彼此不再交流?

与聊天机器人对话永远无法带来同样的人类滋养。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×