Brinkmanship in the Strait of Hormuz - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

Brinkmanship in the Strait of Hormuz

America’s president is trapped, but Tehran is overplaying its hand
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.65,"text":"This week marks the halfway point of the interim deal the US and Iran signed last month to extend a ceasefire 60 days and — crucially for President Donald Trump — reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The hope had been that by day 30, which falls on Wednesday, mines would be cleared from the waterway and shipping would be returning to prewar levels, toll-free. "}],[{"start":26.799999999999997,"text":"Instead, after days of tit-for-tat strikes, Iran announced at the weekend that it was once more fully closing the strait. The US president then said he would reimpose a naval blockade on Iranian ports that he had lifted after the signing of the memorandum of understanding (MoU). Vexed at his inability to impose his will on Iran, Trump insisted on Monday the US would charge a 20 per cent fee on cargo through the strait then retracted his plan on Tuesday."}],[{"start":53.75,"text":"All this would be farcical were it not so serious. The longer shipping through the strait is blocked the more pain will be heaped on the global economy, particularly on poorer energy importers. Before the war, a fifth of the world’s oil and gas passed through the narrow waterway, along with petrochemicals, helium and fertiliser feedstock. The longer the US and Iran battle over control of it, the greater the risk that the escalatory cycle plunges the region back into a full-blown war."}],[{"start":83.1,"text":"The quagmire underlines once again the foolishness of the war launched by Trump against the advice of many of his allies and without much understanding of his enemy. A crisis of Trump’s own making has left Tehran with newfound leverage in the strait, which Iran had never before closed in the past. It has also led to the rise of a more hawkish leadership, emboldened by its ability to withstand US-Israeli bombardment and raise the costs to the global economy."}],[{"start":110.35,"text":"The Islamic regime is determined not to surrender control of the waterway. And for all Trump’s insistence that the US can reopen the strait, there is no chance of shipping returning to any semblance of normality as long as Iran is attacking vessels. "}],[{"start":125.89999999999999,"text":"Tehran is recklessly overplaying its hand. In the MoU, it committed to “make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels”. Instead, it is attacking ships daily. For all its defiance, the Islamic republic suffered devastating blows in the war and its economy is in crisis, with inflation soaring to about 90 per cent. The angrier Trump becomes, the greater the risk he lashes out by targeting critical civilian infrastructure as he has threatened."}],[{"start":155.5,"text":"There is still an exit route. The MoU has drawn much criticism, but it offered an alternative to endless war and was never meant as a final deal. It was designed to foster a de-escalatory climate to allow talks on a final settlement, including on Iran’s nuclear programme. It gave both sides an incentive to pursue a diplomatic path. For Trump, restarting traffic through the strait would at least begin to ease the global energy squeeze. For Iran, it would have begun to unlock billions of dollars of its frozen funds. The significant sanctions relief Tehran desires would only come with a final deal. "}],[{"start":195.45,"text":"The battle over the strait has upended that process. A key problem is that Iran interprets the MoU’s language as enabling it to retain control over the waterway. The US, meanwhile, has encouraged ships to avoid Iranian waters and use a route along Oman’s coast, diluting Tehran’s influence. Unless this dispute is resolved, the path to a diplomatic end to the war is blocked. The only way to break the deadlock is for the warring parties to return to the negotiating table and work with mediators on a modus vivendi for the strait. If not, they will remain trapped in a deadly game of brinkmanship that neither side can win."}],[{"start":238.1,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1784085546_4609.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

欧洲风机制造商探讨合并,抗衡中国对手

欧盟更新并购审查指南之际,中国竞争压力或将推动行业并购。

特朗普压低油价的能力受到考验

黑格:随着伊朗冲突一拖再拖,口头干预或已不足以抑制油价。

朝韩竞相建造核动力潜艇

去年获得唐纳德•特朗普首肯后,韩国看到了发展更强大潜艇的机会。

电子价签之争凸显美国经济焦虑

新泽西州成为首个叫停电子价签的州,原因是担心这些价签会将动态定价机制引入杂货店,甚至监视顾客。

一周展望:美联储会加息吗?

投资者本周还将密切关注英国央行可能如何应对通胀再度抬头的迹象。

使用Kimi K3等中国开源AI模型有何风险?

萨克斯:真正的问题不在于海外开源,而在于缺乏保护基础设施的协调机制来应对网络攻击。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×